From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 6AzoIgXBsl8XSgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:12:21 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id AAbCHgXBsl9gewAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:12:21 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBCFE9401BE for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:12:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:50234 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1keizC-0004p1-PF for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:12:18 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60904) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1keiw5-0001o7-MF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:09:05 -0500 Received: from dustycloud.org ([50.116.34.160]:55502) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1keiw2-0007Eg-0l; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:09:05 -0500 Received: from twig (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dustycloud.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CD4126650; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:08:35 -0500 (EST) References: <87tuuixjno.fsf@gmail.com> <87zh3w5ytp.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87wnz05u7d.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87tuu46tqm.fsf@gmail.com> <87lff3iueo.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87y2j2c4u1.fsf@gmail.com> <87r1otxsgc.fsf@gmail.com> <877dqlgpxf.fsf@dustycloud.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 From: Christopher Lemmer Webber To: Miguel =?utf-8?Q?=C3=81ngel?= Arruga Vivas Subject: Re: [PATCH] Automatically set `geiser-guile-load-path' from .dir-locals In-reply-to: <877dqlgpxf.fsf@dustycloud.org> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:07:59 -0500 Message-ID: <871rgtgoow.fsf@dustycloud.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=50.116.34.160; envelope-from=cwebber@dustycloud.org; helo=dustycloud.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/11/16 12:45:51 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-TUID: SYCTg/nRMg/r Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > Miguel =C3=81ngel Arruga Vivas writes: > >> I haven't reported it yet, but as you can see I have a reproducer script >> attached. I haven't seen anything in vc-code that points in that >> direction, surely though Emacs people will have a better understanding. >> >> Christopher, would you mind to CC me if you open the bug? I can do it >> too if you tell me to, but I don't want to create a duplicate entry if >> we do it roughly at the same time. > > It sounds like you're already putting together the work to do it. If > you don't mind doing it that would save me a lot of time right > now... I'm quite swamped! I'd be very grateful! > >> Apart from the tracking reference, I agree that it's worth applying it. >> And also, thank you both for making easier to work on guix. :-) > > Okay cool; since you two have already basically reviewed this code I'll > just make the suggested change and push it to the master branch. Thank > you! I've pushed the fix to master. I also did the setq-local thing as another commit. However, since Miguel is the one submitting the upstream report, I left a TODO item to link to that once done. Miguel, do you mind committing that once done?