From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 2EZHDRAOs18PSQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 23:41:04 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id iKQaCRAOs1/+dQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 23:41:04 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9E6D940367 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 23:41:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43824 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1keo7K-0003Tb-S1 for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:41:02 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55414) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1keo6w-0003Pq-9P for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:40:38 -0500 Received: from dustycloud.org ([50.116.34.160]:55826) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1keo6u-0007Fw-C8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:40:37 -0500 Received: from twig (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dustycloud.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8C7D26650; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:40:10 -0500 (EST) References: <877dtj753p.fsf@gmail.com> <871rja3hdv.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87eena1tl5.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87wo12zhob.fsf@dustycloud.org> <874knxonu8.fsf@gnu.org> <87lff3heun.fsf@dustycloud.org> <874klpgprg.fsf@dustycloud.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 From: Christopher Lemmer Webber Subject: Re: Setuid programs In-reply-to: <874klpgprg.fsf@dustycloud.org> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:39:34 -0500 Message-ID: <871rgsg9c9.fsf@dustycloud.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=50.116.34.160; envelope-from=cwebber@dustycloud.org; helo=dustycloud.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/11/16 18:10:25 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -8 X-Spam_score: -0.9 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.99 X-TUID: usJ16SJJsnmq Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > I've attached a patch that includes my plan for the setuid stuff. I > could submit this to guix-patches I suppose if that would be better. > But I wonder if I should actually just rebase the wip-postfix on top of > master, apply this, and then start working on setting up postfix to make > use of it. I changed my mind since the setuid stuff is more general, is not blocked by the postfix work. Thus bug #44700 is tracking this.