From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:5f26::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id cCiBLOtxmmXwfQAAkFu2QA (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 07 Jan 2024 10:42:03 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id CDzqJutxmmUEBAAAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 07 Jan 2024 10:42:03 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=nicolasgoaziou.fr header.s=mailo header.b=oWGaFKKr; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1704620523; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=UTLNAPNBZBihtrLx0GPue62MNukvupc6wfChJjkDF9g=; b=GuHj/6sCW9CHVLpABM7HN6NxG9T4EKv3CWsMfEmBCBAexbsx05fh+84SrQyXr91XxaLtRL UMb9WOYPePrS9Y+ibvFmOngR29V02Womme9otgvz0Y0wS2Y7Jg4kgEstFxRZo7W/nfm+LB oEg8+OuRlQEgGKm23TJ+1051V5bpbBNz8nXF71dynZEbv2o3PiNxdcztYEM2CI0Ri6RBhX vrYfv46DTfqjOQSUAKFwbJ63KhgX81o/Tn2Rmlz7WGRvgcZFk0FbqA3VB1/Ib9sTt0ur3L TlXc8Hiu9/TsAXQ4RF+uOFKPAP2Q85XiNAGVFkRUwLSsJF2lGuM27IwNhU0bhw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1704620523; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=fLY6PvnLGP0AtO1hvcUl82kzcqogluHN/0LsX8uaevts7KdmfVcxtN0M2jLT5gUhVN88oH Vkh0FaOm/75nsOVx96U795DCIybd5lbxQHjjLWx9S4W9pvwQJbhiqTXx9coPABjO1zSEig oLTHB2Z66cBgOFnHAGMq1k785uhOJgxakakwpOlDhEUhQ0ywFPjc0Kxi9WhSXinVSId2Rz KLLHO5cbRDwLVsXLNphfsCbTwbuUbFaQ+BBY+TAtnCFc3JrdCZ0Dj3TMo8t6hDZGBV8Q8A TY5Qkrv8iO6mzbEIdTJO3Ic1sgYe2v1H97EeMyHpk71krH3GvYKmuEaORIfRVg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=nicolasgoaziou.fr header.s=mailo header.b=oWGaFKKr; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDEBC3EEAA for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2024 10:42:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rMPel-0006Ru-KC; Sun, 07 Jan 2024 04:41:23 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rMPej-0006Rf-Qy for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jan 2024 04:41:21 -0500 Received: from msg-4.mailo.com ([213.182.54.15] helo=mailo.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rMPei-0006z8-77 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jan 2024 04:41:21 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nicolasgoaziou.fr; s=mailo; t=1704620476; bh=/dWcsmIxRMMGMSmzy0uOVirXCly98az/CkIsnY8Eq+s=; h=X-EA-Auth:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date: Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=oWGaFKKrRztsCBBIfZ6W7snVZX+J47TElNm3m5gCHm6OXAwxrGbXgBSTOAkcNqStG jJTCKwoAJKpZdqrkhfKjex4QaOkTQHBkfTBWbSyxpyNwDDEpC89tTMxWAF416WIa6R I5+7EEWe5M/X47RGIo+hXL7Om2yMtsKR9TFCsefo= Received: by b221-1.in.mailobj.net [192.168.90.21] with ESMTP via ip-20.mailobj.net [213.182.54.20] Sun, 7 Jan 2024 10:41:16 +0100 (CET) X-EA-Auth: l/4ob4zL55dkSi8HeZz+90wMznLqVM0RlR+hSCg3BeA8qkNGXuMAV8esVf1+tBpwmP4ZHU5RqnOdgh8xmywpXfr9X83lyPLbj7VDwtNK9G0= To: Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." Cc: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>, Felix Lechner Subject: Re: How/where/when to ask for a patch review? In-Reply-To: <87msth6d4m.fsf@lease-up.com> (Felix Lechner via's message of "Sat, 06 Jan 2024 19:22:49 -0800") References: <87msth6d4m.fsf@lease-up.com> Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2024 10:41:00 +0100 Message-ID: <871qatjxar.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=213.182.54.15; envelope-from=mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr; helo=mailo.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Nicolas Goaziou From: Nicolas Goaziou via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.28 X-Spam-Score: -5.28 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: BDEBC3EEAA X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-TUID: 6s1H1OpEgaon Hello, Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." writes: > On Sat, Jan 06 2024, Tomas Volf wrote: > >> what is the proper channel to ask for a patch review and how long >> should one wait before doing so. I think it is reasonable to bump the bug report associated to your patch after a week, or possibly two during a winter break. Note that committers generally wait for a green flag in the QA page . Unfortunately, I noticed it had some hiccups recently. > Please don't waste your time waiting. The process of patch review and > acceptance here is erratic. I won't go into reasons; the project > understands the problem and is trying several solutions but I'm not sure > they are working. Please go ahead and maintain your own fork of Guix. It is certainly a pragmatic answer, but hopefully, we can do better. > No chance. I run about a hundred patches on top of stock and build half > of all packages myself (mainly due to a defective eudev in Guix). In > another month, I'll be at two hundred. IMHO, at this point, you should ask for write access to the project, This would certainly help everyone involved. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou