From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id SFSzHqIGcV+QXQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 21:39:46 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id kJOAGqIGcV/oXAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 21:39:46 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 400EC940393 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 21:39:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43080 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMeOX-0000UB-8h for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 17:39:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49246) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMdcR-00085x-5F for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 16:50:04 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x441.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::441]:46364) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMdcM-0007i3-K9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 16:50:02 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x441.google.com with SMTP id o5so9666852wrn.13 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 13:49:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=6jB+kgkFDP2k6/OW3nl85xqqPQEsjK0tbjhAZfGwBmQ=; b=L2/XiGxjt4QWKb/6sWXWqZWybblaZ7YJLMInbuYlkMjKlMECFsIndts1OrOfRDKegk 8cmTewfURt32GICmRMILSXt9sbrB2kCIiSTjxZFZ5dL+T8mF+tiV5QIXqUnXbvARusAZ 9mND/hu1qNI7E72zAymudd9oVTTrA9aVjh9TEkw1xLGC6Nq28tKW4jx/l237rbLfcQIT 0petNNNXe26OIBS6LqOmx7A6iAY3zo/oyqVpujnw1D2Lr+NI5CsyQeb/fVlLUxY0e4RZ S8YBKXWoE4zTQzXMs14R6GzwunGv/bnRkweWiJKP/eC6I34KbRvJNKwGhvGL6Wk/0UZ2 nfRw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=6jB+kgkFDP2k6/OW3nl85xqqPQEsjK0tbjhAZfGwBmQ=; b=WGcxXGu3YateiDcwnwDVavgq4/ThQ2FftL7d8A/gCT3yHVtdQFKaPokXgUIRieSO5T MVxZU0VLFGV39Czfv3buw2ejiHtj42xq0L2DZ74z1614QfS4nv901fndGqBRwgYPLEl+ 2rkluSqEr+3NjKik2JPF6+wZKArPG5gpnMXGYBF65QC3WYDW0W3OmHYqIyezMARnmsfG fR3LkfxbqAIBGvWK8bv8f8qo7M6F9QtLj/+o8S+ub3hcQH+pykoQ5x1DggUHdsNdavu5 2boYumfuuo9Yb5+znf8wWvl+Ig7l9mNDqVa6bU7QvO4TTi3iasIDooEwETrCxduRA4x2 7q/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531FGACQcowWRJVCLOq6hcY/RaOXzurcxFCwuHPF1hdkkeGicq+h GZXqvxlRprDDSuKgJ3cVG4Ggvp0vHIvGUw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzvK56/F+SsSLtD7yFAbK4/VpjVS3iDQXBS76PmJGEUul85Ae7qrkK9X/02BZKbJxfHVlKRuw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:100c:: with SMTP id a12mr16311782wrx.115.1601239796010; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 13:49:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from susa ([41.80.167.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e1sm10902559wrp.49.2020.09.27.13.49.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 27 Sep 2020 13:49:55 -0700 (PDT) From: "Bonface M. K." To: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?) References: <86wo0mnjs3.fsf@gmail.com> <87d02e3v61.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87k0wjt774.fsf@roquette.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87h7rk8pmz.fsf@netris.org> <877dsgs8ch.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <871rio8c0t.fsf@netris.org> <87imbz7mq2.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <878scvwkwd.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 23:49:47 +0300 In-Reply-To: <878scvwkwd.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> (Pierre Neidhardt's message of "Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:53:38 +0200") Message-ID: <86wo0fndw4.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::441; envelope-from=bonfacemunyoki@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x441.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 17:39:29 -0400 X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=L2/XiGxj; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 3.79 X-TUID: iiTuhEpxia8N --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Pierre Neidhardt writes: > Just tested, EXWM works with emacs-no-x-toolkit! > Just tested it too, and it works for me too :) > So I suggest we add the following packages: > > (define-public emacs-no-x-toolkit-xelb > (package > (inherit emacs-xelb) > (name "emacs-no-x-toolkit-xelb") > (arguments > (substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments emacs-xelb) > ((#:emacs emacs) `,emacs-no-x-toolkit))))) > > (define-public emacs-no-x-toolkit-exwm=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 > (package > (inherit emacs-exwm) > (name "emacs-no-x-toolkit-exwm") > (synopsis "Emacs X window manager (without X toolkit)") > (propagated-inputs > `(("emacs-no-x-toolkit-xelb" ,emacs-no-x-toolkit-xelb))) > (arguments > (substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments emacs-exwm) > ((#:emacs emacs) `,emacs-no-x-toolkit))))) > > Thoughts? Wouldn't that be redundant? If you wanted to use EXWM, we already have EXWM provided on MELPA, so you could just set that up. That's IMHO though. =2D-=20 Bonface M. K. (https://www.bonfacemunyoki.com) Chief Emacs Mchochezi / Twitter: @BonfaceKilz GPG key =3D D4F09EB110177E03C28E2FE1F5BBAE1E0392253F --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJNBAEBCAA3FiEE1PCesRAXfgPCji/h9buuHgOSJT8FAl9w+u8ZHGJvbmZhY2Vt dW55b2tpQGdtYWlsLmNvbQAKCRD1u64eA5IlP89eEACWxhIX5IAo9C/ttqOtnZRn QTiEG38KG2pho4nVCtY96QrXyC/DlQmGrBRXwrOMvCgFNxdwNNHOE9XpEKrYK97x NYbBXJOz4Ks1tkiMgJYIf2vQFJI/3NA/dxsxmjKQZ6fD+5dyQWcDQnGCdEn7JLob 60X2o21ogKVspz0n/TQXlPhTul8wsoOLBdA6d8h8j1Q2/p/RovQYcihDCh/re/WG qKlJXq5GsTag96Tjs5j6TacroDqamqVNVsoYWz5u4Io2t3byzyXASn+8EXjPl1bY BwWJoJ9UB6GFC7ig5lHXWdkcB2xAKUK34woQisgocEuWXlpwlFh8ZAWinsLvlqBH /bszzsw2whEtO/ytLx7GDLTWce84kL/9VRTXgEw09lb35Qzq/E9WUnx09pBrOluZ Or8fEap8AVjXCyadUGu5dzmq8Ca6i4zwzA8yiKJED/DGjGzG4SRXDZ/tnE38z9/n DLK0N0H8SIp/PQYomutglAkaZ0fkoEg/zFJxe0MrSyY5bZs/lYC/DGwbJBUnqbrT ukvjCSIcTiuxoxy+jQEdP8kA4HdIu5Or7mYZQCaM2+Eqw046/C1jA5SF12M29Xc2 F9OiaQ5RgI/cM8nL3xEAao/C67TKO12bMWZTAgb+iUt8sigOB5JzSKyfwc08Lr5U TpKMob9mCcj7/0kO0HyIjw== =Rpdv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--