From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id yAXqOGWsCWQ0kQAASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 09 Mar 2023 10:52:37 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id UIMCOWWsCWT5eAEA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 09 Mar 2023 10:52:37 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C419C3D748 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 10:52:37 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=Vd+qvG+2; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1678355557; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=ZlV+9ZcUr84gijiXxlRt8E7tdeDR+WguaZsWNkkrheU=; b=LEcNVest/5StEk8eeVziOGi1GeuV1Ws8iEDx3FRfF/TNb5o25+Zq4Ygz93ti1dGhLlTFj4 dcxP9FMCxfl09HXu8AYgGnO5DdptsGNSmLxmhFFVVvTgGVXR2OpAzeQGOE9Q4SMX2iWo9c 2xw4FzGP+Ts90qu4vkTuYkd16gVf1Qt2BUCw9rZO1HXbZsuYu8LjrZY/2J1jy96Wbeayeb kytJWbVS6t6krcnhSBHZaLOC7a5N4LBayXUs5dnudZzvL5bzBum2HA8rE8lYubTHThGt+t CYlrxoUEYZLBZ8WU0/D+dKP2cSYmUsfFpkEuKMZFr8OvQ0OssJrsywdGsbbFdw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1678355557; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Pw+gDr3A0pEfb4gGyfOAqoiV6Zua2jM8rf67MZw+rAtP7fYxtkQrIAtYwjGRZvLef3I9YQ 86sTgN2tfVHEIdAyZujZ8WRjG/4p13uuaYlH48vyLqLkZOVyWpOOPAykGVk6ug9KxFvax5 CtnNuAIH1X8+/EDolxXq/zG60/8zp1lflw1uERwICBRzfZWb7bp7KUmoUH0sCQXXpf4z25 lcZS8n7kl/ZUDoeTVDdG1l60hb2o/20cUtfVTESF1Ltetq+28FQaPI3amZ2xVsc7LWdWuW DLNOL+0xvX5tlhK+gb5yaNScDl1Bdl2uiOgbvoQXB5+3UcfN2xB0GmdV+1lHfA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=Vd+qvG+2; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1paCwO-00077P-Dk; Thu, 09 Mar 2023 04:52:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1paCwM-00076q-QJ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2023 04:52:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1paCwM-0002wR-Hl for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2023 04:52:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1paCwM-0007UU-EX for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2023 04:52:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#61894] [PATCH RFC] Team approval for patches Resent-From: Simon Tournier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2023 09:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61894 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Maxim Cournoyer , Leo Famulari Cc: guix-maintainers@gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Christopher Baines , 61894@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6?= , Andreas Enge , guix-devel@gnu.org Received: via spool by 61894-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61894.167835549528745 (code B ref 61894); Thu, 09 Mar 2023 09:52:02 +0000 Received: (at 61894) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Mar 2023 09:51:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50931 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1paCvv-0007TY-Cu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2023 04:51:35 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f43.google.com ([209.85.128.43]:39683) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1paCvs-0007TJ-U7 for 61894@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2023 04:51:33 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f43.google.com with SMTP id t25-20020a1c7719000000b003eb052cc5ccso3130328wmi.4 for <61894@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 09 Mar 2023 01:51:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1678355487; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ZlV+9ZcUr84gijiXxlRt8E7tdeDR+WguaZsWNkkrheU=; b=Vd+qvG+2un1UdY7KBHdAPOxKjUTuAaYBLg9S7Ibir4fJtyxbgn9he3nBhsDTspuaXm OMc52YiuRdL+i0wsveTHZau/sIDej4tA95mAKE52mB06fXwlPHlRaGUMFzbFyOQ36+1x Yoqa76SetLC2MMigMzt0WudR/8hQM4qXdaMM1ZcLzUyl4odB0PHmDpUXNQ1gkYGgOzfE meIfTikKvzuouQw3IvY5c/zX5ksJtEQOdfbA8t4wCm3yjKNPppHh6LS+Qyydgg1MDu3h xncY7K4L08K3XiRCPXo9rlG6sqY3uRdZ5bXdWXCbi50qWV818u+e8VFJqUvJDyAoWZKn vFsg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678355487; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ZlV+9ZcUr84gijiXxlRt8E7tdeDR+WguaZsWNkkrheU=; b=HG80hFqqbCUWT6JcWTuhDBtMKZi7HiFoiwH67IxqjQ8aJ7zEPrg87LngpZ3PQ7cjUg 4mAgb8nLJlYIoK7/dHbLuImKsPDMwQN5tQ12LqbkydwY1nkEee7cGAg5Xbsz4/E5LTV1 kT375v6g+0djcWM72Ek7KYFUXdX4PcBycV193ab5bSXJiZNzkeRt2zVpE4YPhWcmDbJX k9keovYXqE8pkGALUtcC93lbdG4zt5W0yRFT+XAWrOAMfQbLwyiMcb5t9QL46uCSRYIZ qdAEVE/k9QbGrCQeilmIKxEV7U7LzskBClkoVTainrHBDvCCmiSLFUH0L+PpvUmkYYi5 Fztw== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKX232Irm+yJ/xO6deiqM2yZZ3QIDkRT8+PD9YrJhKrqim6mDl48 ayq4w3Bd9a7ID3GKh29K8h0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8TWMiLONevLmVm6E0xJV4rLNUYrKptA7mCp9VqGOv0u+lFEm+tkLvxDCLhb4oTJdP7ak+thw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1c1e:b0:3df:f7ba:14f8 with SMTP id j30-20020a05600c1c1e00b003dff7ba14f8mr1583777wms.1.1678355486848; Thu, 09 Mar 2023 01:51:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([157.99.255.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j4-20020a05600c1c0400b003dc5b59ed7asm2289191wms.11.2023.03.09.01.51.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 09 Mar 2023 01:51:26 -0800 (PST) From: Simon Tournier In-Reply-To: <874jqvul1v.fsf@gmail.com> References: <878rgga1qv.fsf@inria.fr> <871qm8wf8e.fsf@cbaines.net> <87r0u86qgo.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87y1o9mina.fsf_-_@envs.net> <861qm0da4y.fsf@gmail.com> <87sfegwh28.fsf@gmail.com> <874jqvul1v.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2023 09:48:21 +0100 Message-ID: <86v8janwdm.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: X-Spam: Yes X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam: Yes X-Migadu-Queue-Id: C419C3D748 X-Spam-Score: 8.30 X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 8.30 List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-TUID: Jm1xEp9qhqNG Hi, On Wed, 08 Mar 2023 at 13:58, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > number of their R package updates (thanks!)). It seems starting to use > the 'Reviewed-by' git message tag would make this easy to account for. Quoting from thread [1]: I agree that Reviewed-by would be helpful. Once reviewed, the author or the reviewer could roll the count and re-send the patch (or series), applying the line Reviewed-by. It would reward the reviewer for their work. And it would help the committer work. Subject: Thoughts on committers pushing simple changes from other committers? 1: Cheers, simon