From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: myglc2 Subject: cuirass question Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 21:37:54 -0400 Message-ID: <86tw61uhe5.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48810) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cwIqe-0002KQ-Uu for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 21:38:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cwIqb-0000CM-T8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 21:38:01 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c]:35857) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cwIqb-0000Bx-P4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 21:37:57 -0400 Received: by mail-qk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id p22so52250044qka.3 for ; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 18:37:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from g1 (c-73-167-118-254.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.118.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u63sm2128144qkh.45.2017.04.06.18.37.56 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 06 Apr 2017 18:37:56 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel In "6.2.7.15 Continuous Integration" there is a reference to '(https://notabug.org/mthl/cuirass)' but the doc is for GuixSD '(gnu services cuirass)'. And git://git.sv.gnu.org/guix/maintenance.git/hydra/bayfront.scm also uses GuixSD '(gnu services cuirass)'. So here is the question... Is it correct to assume that the primary cuirass way forward is (gnu servies cuirass) on GuixSD? If so, should the reference to '(https://notabug.org/mthl/cuirass)' be removed? TIA - George