From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joshua Branson Subject: Re: Extending Guix without using the Guile load path Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 14:32:59 -0400 Message-ID: <86r1xqal2c.fsf@dismail.de> References: <87o8tulhci.fsf@elephly.net> <871rpxu2fb.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59368) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jEH1X-0000bW-7Z for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 14:33:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jEH1W-0007MF-91 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 14:33:07 -0400 Received: from mx2.dismail.de ([159.69.191.136]:42939) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jEH1V-00074m-Lm for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 14:33:06 -0400 Received: from mx2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 1dad3fca for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 19:33:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.11]) by mx2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 8bd2fee0 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 19:33:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id fbb519d7 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 19:33:02 +0100 (CET) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 9caf227b (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 19:33:02 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <871rpxu2fb.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Thu, 12 Mar 2020 14:29:28 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > > (Though eventually, I do think something like Guix Home should be part > of Guix itself. :-)) May I ask is Guix Home similar to systemd homed? Or do they have slightly different objectives? --=20 Joshua Branson Sent from Emacs and Gnus