From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id CDB0Okzry19oOwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 20:19:24 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id hwdANkzry18DIgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 20:19:24 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B48D39402D6 for ; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 20:19:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:55288 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kle1b-0000DD-N0 for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 15:19:23 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37020) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kle1C-0000BC-FC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 15:18:58 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x330.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::330]:54572) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kle18-0006Kg-NN; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 15:18:58 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-x330.google.com with SMTP id d3so8177061wmb.4; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 12:18:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0H7km1LejrxnmIWd7TwHptB3IjQH7gsoqfpTtiiJ27c=; b=VSWMNckl4eVhH5qwy2yJdTL2lLgEskh/R1zoTMGfPJJIh42EWfHNKUBlg4vxAPegDZ vdTLBr1kbef6IIcqXDxbw2LsAVNbehR3eXzJ2+NsvZfyK2tMBhllrTBbTeNOChIXL5A3 XGX7NPdPrlFaVOPsvtgt8pFM77Q68c7o55Jo3+8gfSIrj0zGVV8TL479Rtp3c49D33rJ S/0oXIlBAJ8nm5YymEH36T0xvcguUpKoNao6vgSWQ7AXmCjxDkGyqxXTYCzQAflVPOrV kNfHr6GHNX58+37l1WBFygsHd7I5M5J2WkSk5YjYvcE3H55oyfKUBDlLjkB9QntrGWo/ qj4Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0H7km1LejrxnmIWd7TwHptB3IjQH7gsoqfpTtiiJ27c=; b=mtpJjmLHan21gkSxtJkaYdH+KcTqczURkP5N77hlYnu3gANIZiLYTuM9H0IinThh0c nnEIet/8efGXbf+PVLgtJmENr9OGkDqdiGTUF2Ombv8WTtmUg+PdJTvJqEYb5k7BzbaN U9xM7q9vzjy1FtwMaeZJpdEYklVimGFzOPUSYH48idrZ+59+4JzS6mFE9GM6saZHGUKW B/CgV/4TUmoJ6xbkLOjP5ICw128dZ7neqpz467Ux9VpwzvTfAZkPM1Z2R2kZSeDmgFfD xB175hbsY1WZH90+8rKDs1yfkCbvD2P8W1YQmo+282knFcXs9qe3fSEEhKL2A9DauRpH kWfg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5321c0HwHvrPEYm3ZMaKsTUYqJWVN8f6YrW0ApWAOb2CG9x8T3Z4 /bfNhVT/9P4/5dctFbjYq/vfGkBuO9o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwUsxbsq3ka5heu0xjhgv2FpMiy/DiXQ103Oyxetip7xJq3Ly5+/sTfWVNUFovVy9v+FyMAMg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:1d1:: with SMTP id 200mr10787693wmb.98.1607199532639; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 12:18:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q17sm8708765wrr.53.2020.12.05.12.18.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 05 Dec 2020 12:18:52 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: [support-renew@gandi.net: [GANDI] guixsd.org expires in 60 days] In-Reply-To: <87tut0w76x.fsf@nckx> References: <20201202204709.GB12770@jurong> <87sg8k45gu.fsf@gnu.org> <87tut0w76x.fsf@nckx> Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2020 21:12:42 +0100 Message-ID: <86r1o49flx.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::330; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x330.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.20 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=VSWMNckl; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: B48D39402D6 X-Spam-Score: -1.20 X-Migadu-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu X-TUID: bhO5sohYrVqt Hi Tobias, On Sat, 05 Dec 2020 at 17:25, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > I believe that consistently redirecting[0] these old names to=20 > guix.gnu.org makes them much less harmful to keep around, and=20 > better than giving up control completely. Which versions of Guix uses only the old URLs? Are they reachable with inferiors? Are the substitutes still available on Berlin and friends for these old Guix versions? Otherwise, I do not see the rationale. If the Guix code current and reachable by =E2=80=9Cguix time-machine=E2=80=9D provides the right URL (sa= y ci.guix.gnu.org instead of berlin.guixsd.org), then I do not see why it matters to keep the control of berlin.guixsd.org; because nothing will break if the old URLs are removed. Do I miss an obvious point? Note that www.guixsd.org does not redirect. All the best, simon