From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:c151::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id +N6lHrKpTGDUfQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 12:01:54 +0000 Received: from aspmx2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:c151::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id SKFWGrKpTGDGBwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 12:01:54 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx2.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B5E52AC64 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 13:01:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:48016 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lL2xF-0002b4-F2 for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 07:01:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49664) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lL2wy-0002ah-MA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 07:00:57 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x334.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::334]:52103) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lL2wx-0004Jd-48 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 07:00:56 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-x334.google.com with SMTP id l19so5300718wmh.1 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 04:00:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=pjTeBt6bRrIECbJzb8fHJmzA+yhlYTMxiwWd+mbDNwM=; b=FxtH/8KcgNXMAG8CGfwvRWFy1gYDtXr8ZTLT4wqvrVdXEdSJ7+t0hSmgRtPSCWIaMj Yo5v0AubL0zaki3hwkRGwSYsVaARBdJGGWpRSleKxWPsdHnvetVOyqdsUF7hTLHIT/4X jMWoQ/WnXvhsDJ/4Ix99jY1KhGYEr+yVrzP+YtvUwSr64uvijibhDU0cRRYvAk96e1+j RXaRsgk45u7fPKk1X3BmgvQdMOODVmbK48o74QLEQ3IuOBvVPhSicSZceNBUpECBQJVQ lJfzQvIQ8L9eXK5wpRqa4AG7E4JeM/VMieKxEjHyineFF65WSTPfbWo+vOCNXZ2zA++J YeTg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pjTeBt6bRrIECbJzb8fHJmzA+yhlYTMxiwWd+mbDNwM=; b=Hyb/eGvAGlLSnjRlHZFXFNSbqTr/Tqh0aOGwVs0dMOVdTR1/uP3JF4efxSC4kDKJ55 YcEfn1yaZLxot6NFppt4ZS97FrHW7VewuL0jQEfxBoyMT3k0q/3CRk9RkOjoVdwx3PLm cqbBBpRR6QyoXgR35LASrsbPaS7KZqeOWNTUWT2U+KnUrXKpl/mMUAO8NFLkl7oygi8z MpDngYV6SfozrwSEfOSI+CqyK8kesOubELM1DF+vdXH4QCfR+XlwdD17jta4P0qAQjAl JrKz+NZv3l3zR4hhu0uBGOTV4uGuCw5CRjUBdQIubBrMT1L7abUudvsKMHURHoxhhw60 410A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532VD86JLY0s9j8wrXdHdqqwyvvnr4KBFBxYzS14UtyKLMWNXfI5 tx31qDv3ZfqGtiSThgckYCqp+l/qflg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxqrpreE2SOwfpNnyJLaUovRO7tIOg81nGr+NW7Pv0rrjqJiVekdQ9QX/IgeLt4JfVhwBqruw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:a958:: with SMTP id s85mr18072979wme.4.1615636851683; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 04:00:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b131sm6483839wmb.34.2021.03.13.04.00.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 13 Mar 2021 04:00:51 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun To: =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=A9o?= Le Bouter , Mark H Weaver , guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: gnutls package may be vulnerable to CVE-2021-20232 In-Reply-To: References: <87o8fns6ob.fsf@netris.org> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 12:53:19 +0100 Message-ID: <86mtv7gths.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::334; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x334.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-TUID: 6ivcGiZ5vXmy Hi L=C3=A9o, On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 at 11:50, L=C3=A9o Le Bouter wrot= e: > On Sat, 2021-03-13 at 05:12 -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote: >> For what it's worth, I think that would be a more >> appropriate place to send these bug reports. What do you think? > > I don't know, it seems people read guix-devel more maybe? I don't know > if they are bug reports, most of the time I am handling these issues > myself, I just try to keep a public log so I don't forget things and > can come back later, and if I disappear, other people can still have a > go at them. I also think it is better to fill a bug report for these security issues instead of guix-devel. One reason is debbugs allows severity tags, which can be helpful to filter. Another reason is =C2=ABif you disappear= =C2=BB, people will not dig into guix-devel to read this =E2=80=9Cpublic log=E2=80= =9D but would probably address the items in the bug tracker. I speak for myself, when I read guix-devel or any other Guix list, I have an org-capture and capturing security issue is not in my list (I have enough on my plate :-)). Time to time, I open =E2=80=9CM-x debbugs-gn= u=E2=80=9C and select bugs: check the status and try to close them; and months later from now I will never search in guix-devel to check vulnerabilities of some packages. And even if I would do, the search query, assuming a pattern in the messages, would return both closed and still open security issues, so I would have to read first some messages, even the closed ones, just to find the still open ones; the length of the search results becoming larger and larger. BTW, thanks for all this effort! :-) Cheers, simon