From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id OPdpAuwIvGPMOwAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 13:30:36 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id yEZEAuwIvGPQmwAAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 13:30:36 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB75016305 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 13:30:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pEr9j-0000Mf-4m; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 07:21:35 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pEr9K-00006g-JR for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 07:21:11 -0500 Received: from mx0.riseup.net ([198.252.153.6]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pEr9I-0003ue-Rc for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 07:21:10 -0500 Received: from fews2.riseup.net (fews2-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.riseup.net", Issuer "R3" (not verified)) by mx0.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NrChx1PHvz9sdb; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 12:21:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1673266865; bh=hWH3lk30VXfM5sOqh532bfw09D6hKv4EQLCl0uWDQU0=; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to:From; b=QyzPjEqComdvY63k9jvxMA1JZY/1gtwOxqubotqDCyFUhKuc70q3ZBv5cFhBTwqll gP7Skry1LObRdlpTNA+3MJG/HyMKMAtjkwvP+Pw6Q8HF85swMtv/SLxtitwduHcrcB j/A3mpzkwCAa63oZWqahoM9tXs+bwecIzT9tNsWk= X-Riseup-User-ID: 3CAE549053F452BCCDC0A46E1ACBB04EB131EED4AB7C839214C716301D79A386 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews2.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4NrChw1wh5z1yRB; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 12:21:04 +0000 (UTC) References: <867cxxxgfv.fsf@riseup.net> <663DEABC-D27B-4E6F-B0E8-4B2ADF609F4A@lepiller.eu> <86fsck6bw4.fsf@riseup.net> <86tu10iiws.fsf@riseup.net> <86sfgkyxh9.fsf@posteo.net> From: Csepp To: pukkamustard Cc: Csepp , Julien Lepiller , Guix Devel Subject: Re: Packaging OCaml repositories that define multiple packages? Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 13:07:05 +0100 In-reply-to: <86sfgkyxh9.fsf@posteo.net> Message-ID: <86mt6roq4z.fsf@riseup.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.252.153.6; envelope-from=raingloom@riseup.net; helo=mx0.riseup.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1673267435; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=hWH3lk30VXfM5sOqh532bfw09D6hKv4EQLCl0uWDQU0=; b=GHoe/W26gi2ykhRaKgn4CGK6Um9uIxxs7W5Hdazr4s/TJA0wjMBQCrArjhljMYk17weCX7 SUN2jXvaVOYYIYUpbB88EQl+Dp/cZYqTkMcNU6XKnG14QU1PWE9aqWByydPxXfw0guy8Fj kaFYAlIpcRHTg6n7hFU5tXdGjOB32Bpoyyk8xzi0m4IoeO+V5bLJiFx4ZvXyMfyCpsVZxn 4W4RTIxndfuYqJzEeuwk7qwvx7isyi6140v/fFS7TRqnzThtEpBczRo3MXjnbgiEqcGZN2 MJjXaIIgC6nquB447Bu1hbsIzwhVIhgrooVljowl4Dp69+4s56qlf/HkOMFApQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=QyzPjEqC; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=riseup.net ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1673267435; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=kAyJ1NTslfdibSYxMU3TLxNnZZuHJxfBHaQn4rUqO01dS1In/4oE0pbRF56PB7SlL5kpP3 06i3ZjA/bdBVB/DmvYox2s3W4CuaEBxiki7XVe5bzUlgCNkUqrsz0U3bzS62i2D7tRTGSx cDIhc1Rkp+SlkgIf5kzrx4voAqdkDkKq+87vFy2wOF5V39duilrlc5f3AlS2I0TSTkP4BM k5V9DXWrUDAKsPhzz7yXjLRTL1pZovphr1QuCY6QE7Y8rQlJFBD31k5OuJcxu1BJcI2R3z 3NADTa/wejgUxXU9Loxy4P+d87JSl7/2cgexkJ+0NQsxjk6065m8hy5/Sf7fsA== X-Spam-Score: -5.37 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: AB75016305 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=QyzPjEqC; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=riseup.net X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.37 X-TUID: R8DKDNsbSGX/ pukkamustard writes: > Csepp writes: > >> But there are packages that were added by others that already >> specify >> which subpackage they build, and yet seem to be accepted as >> subpackages. > > Do you have an example? > > And maybe send in your patches, that may provide more context around > this discussion. I submitted them last night, but only 13 out of the 39 got acknowledged. https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?package=guix-patches;include=originator%3Acsepp The one with the aliases is among the unacknowledged ones.