From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id eCZ3MIpk616yWAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 12:56:42 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id yJF0LIpk615ALQAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 12:56:42 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 236B19407C6 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 12:56:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:33232 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlu5x-0002Vx-21 for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 08:56:41 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58614) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlu5p-0002Vc-3J for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 08:56:33 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]:36462) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlu5m-0000PK-Hd; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 08:56:32 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id d128so5543582wmc.1; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 05:56:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AG36U+1B+6WmKVjzdy40ES1b2GNx8ZAgCN1UCnKhorU=; b=ZS/BfykS+GXPxuMzDh2+bTcsn1VNRzHsGuXF1ptL3GeHdnf/sTkcCXymoJzogXTeR/ kFyZKWY5fhGutPvqi+A15P9YukUJVPs+o86p/OvtC3GT6Ajp+sQIq1YKgh8fqf9/XLWR oyZk+n1n1oS9zCAkMwHahqTlU4M5to+KCH1w7V3AKH9KkP/NN0l9wtHyRV1Sd4d430oi iRTaTGdcCpizUPJR+REO3utcO85aRzgfuXFd29jMWekxOBGMJFFn76LZomKPYlrHEMrE +QsRFnL+faK47P5vAGjNyH9vvuZusd63AZnTbBITGiJ6cO2Zwxnapb7V6oKwr5oYI3nr 2lgA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AG36U+1B+6WmKVjzdy40ES1b2GNx8ZAgCN1UCnKhorU=; b=DVKw6kWt/fJakb8N5knSBVFMZXzyy82AbM4aMmlDo9u0NU1C5TO0U3m9WzHrpQzdJy ol382pq/u3Q8zqE0bHGo//YpKh5oY3EXiV0NTbwfAU+mjTgH4WDJkYgfKE+ZAvggUprl 8w17yrYz7NTMR/S2PF89AKRMi0x82Nctv+1D1nFzv7YDm2KQM1yGBRZoXFmUjEC2CmEA MFylBTYPQ/e936Rzf8ysFPylBDo06auCoUtJRSHO3pxhLAjDA4i44T21YCVbnPUXMQP4 zZkICmPEyM0oG596ynH8lIPzucLMMPsFeMsKask292JhqHMBgPq73p3Y/AZs8OEzYeQx gwKg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533oxOGUB0r50Tnt3RqEPq7PJWr97QFtLtkumPwBjQX174UoihRe +wBUUF0e81EOjFPC1nlOrSi3pmEHsw0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyTAywS/Mq5wkr6IYUS1VStuA7Ve8bSYmZJBaXJWClunJm4p/srnnqx1IYQTEwgO2zFIe0D8w== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:6346:: with SMTP id x67mr3218379wmb.139.1592484988217; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 05:56:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x8sm3761988wrs.43.2020.06.18.05.56.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 18 Jun 2020 05:56:27 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Konrad Hinsen Subject: Re: =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=9CReproducible?= research articles, from source code to =?utf-8?Q?PDF=E2=80=9D?= In-Reply-To: <87r1ucmwh5.fsf@inria.fr> References: <87d05ztcxj.fsf@inria.fr> <864kraxjau.fsf@gmail.com> <87k104omnv.fsf@inria.fr> <87r1ucmwh5.fsf@inria.fr> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 14:56:26 +0200 Message-ID: <86lfkkwn0l.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::32f; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x32f.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel , guix-hpc@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=ZS/BfykS; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.71 X-TUID: FD3POjdj7jmc On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 13:42, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> I'd start somewhat differently: generate diverse use case examples. The >> contributions to the ReScience reproducibility challenge could be a nice >> starting point: go through them, one by one, and try to re-implement the >> authors' various approaches with Guix. Then, in a second step, try to >> identify additional tooling support in Guix that would make the recipes >> simpler to implement. That might well lead to the development of ready >> to use templates, but I prefer starting from a use case analysis to see >> what is needed in real life. > > Yes, sounds like a good plan! Maybe we could organize a Virtual Hackathon? Over 1 day? Or 2 days? The power of collective motivation. :-)