From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id eP9pFIa+pGEqeAEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 12:50:30 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id +I42EIa+pGFpdAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 11:50:30 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66B14A7D7 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 12:50:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39112 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mrfAy-000634-JJ for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 06:50:28 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39862) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mrfAb-0005xz-Mi for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 06:50:05 -0500 Received: from mail2.fsfe.org ([213.95.165.55]:40740) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mrfAY-0006i4-TW; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 06:50:05 -0500 From: Jelle Licht DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fsfe.org; s=2021081301; t=1638186595; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iM8JGWvB79PqEuRS5JViFhvv0RdF3DOGWLqqzUJ8deo=; b=VcIMMYEoB2qOGMV/sXnZk6BysaZQZiViyJIvplJCYioHM30r+4h4MQzd6q5wFrWwCBGluo 0ud8l93+ZEDUtDeu2554ucEPQcDYZhFJZqDpydhMUK4L/I4L2anNB1D9Fb81BtxmoNFc7q k5NtmmCgcM1zwzXL4KOYE2tVs0xwVLM= To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: Flag day for simplified package inputs In-Reply-To: <87v90iiyuo.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k0h4i3io.fsf@gnu.org> <86o86gjh8t.fsf@fsfe.org> <87o86cnx4k.fsf@gnu.org> <861r38cjf5.fsf@fsfe.org> <87v90iiyuo.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 12:49:54 +0100 Message-ID: <86ilwb9o65.fsf@fsfe.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=213.95.165.55; envelope-from=jlicht@fsfe.org; helo=mail2.fsfe.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1638186630; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=iM8JGWvB79PqEuRS5JViFhvv0RdF3DOGWLqqzUJ8deo=; b=Fu7LSwiUn9zb/ZZWZw4Vd/cnztgav6A0zNaofc/F7VWBWv81XPqp5kSUay9KVuFWNUMizZ 0OWgTfIOW6jwoEKjZwI97ccb3kCJRb2hKm0rmylltL6kSNScPs+sXT/i0dcFZIlgX1gGNk YeO5yGLCoaia/hJQIYB2AjnEOSm8kRXS1wulUG/+MESWaETvmxF1iBZyGigW/jUJFnznxa oVsjV5zMUe6+F6+6PzMFMzzFzBZKlXcgyOkSqfxONTQSB3vDCu5XYCm40VovsQy2Mq1kzO eysj+u+zP8RLOxvRErIb9AvI8R0DkWALMkzKXIi8jp5zh/6TagptLbSPhQoLpg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1638186630; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=g9SJRhdDZBLSBnO0dh7Nk6bmqiAsrEPchsOK293NikW/7CCQYRntT+lSFAMwlBsvjaYsOJ 5Rq5/pfoSn0Gu9pJ0B0N5D+OPvdRbMtRKE6S1CyqfSf+hAZnfqavYsx+hvyKYKZD6+0AAl 7gB5yX1jjNn/6txilPNcGAXFZBEzAaH96Ii4HxKuBGY3zO8Ma1wTCySAwVbXosJirZTNRz 4ZmGyMHr+YdAtqj+u3Lctewe1kLeedhiWzMJwS8HDDQistIu9o5SYOkM0FhpVDMjRzSjsJ lvHu/vQ/+NXWkvMRH6cFaLe+XFEnk/ipTsSFf5fsmWyfbxVzvdsVCSBk7qisMw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=fsfe.org header.s=2021081301 header.b=VcIMMYEo; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=fsfe.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -6.11 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=fsfe.org header.s=2021081301 header.b=VcIMMYEo; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=fsfe.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 66B14A7D7 X-Spam-Score: -6.11 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: uriJE6VPNgGm Hello there, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hi, > > Jelle Licht skribis: > >> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Jelle Licht skribis: >>> >>>> When applying this and future bulk changes, could we perhaps list the >>>> specific commits (+ commented shortlog line) in a file. To clarify, if >>>> we were to store these commits in `.git-blame-ignore-revs', later on we >>>> can instruct users to run: >>>> >>>> git config blame.ignoreRevsFile .git-blame-ignore-revs >>>> >>>> to ignore the bulk change for git blame purposes. >>> >>> Sounds like a good idea. There=E2=80=99s no particular convention rega= rding the >>> file name of =E2=80=98.git-blame-ignore-revs=E2=80=99, right? >> >> As far as I know there is no established convention, although after >> searching around a bit I found that Sarah Morgensen proposed the exact >> same thing in September. It seems the chromium project also follows the >> same naming scheme, so we won't be totally idiosyncratic at least :). > > Good. :-) Could you (or Sarah?) propose a patch, including a sentence > or two in the manual with the =E2=80=98git config=E2=80=99 snippet? I will work on that. Do we already have a suitable 'bulk change' in the repo? Or should we first run `guix style', and subsequently use that commit as the first entry in the .git-blame-ignore-revs file? - Jelle