From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id QD4ZNqjg6F5EBgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:09:28 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id oJ3gMajg6F7KeQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:09:28 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7786294053C for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:09:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39496 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlDDL-0003gj-74 for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 11:09:27 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42462) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlDD8-0003e1-1c for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 11:09:14 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]:37727) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlDD6-0008Kl-Dl; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 11:09:13 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id y20so3471025wmi.2; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 08:09:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=NRId7ZbjHayY/j52bm6wgWmZYF5yQklOiUUUuRj/huI=; b=eBIpu1wQhtRclw0P2t28sN9UyokCn7/36OD6SBApGo1o/wSjM1XZKAUT90oV2i9n7R vWSvX9HrPJOdmn05iC1Cn5wlUfEYCIBlfXaSjHkjY3UYPSQjgyIpXqvmlMlWqd/foxyc JzDqa3G4kc8d981I/OnaH1xUoUmI3ZgbDceOscAFsmRivaSq7t979Vi4iVmchwRFkzCa YrDmYiUOQ6PDuffjrDooNMGXpRbANanQg0v4flwddzp2ukQDfE+HiHnMOopFcj4Y3gxc 2xGrI1ITkyzIveCfzQCyBzNJ2OLPWsRDxH2IYab85kx77lY9JRqPQtOx3YsHV95BRGfc ixOg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=NRId7ZbjHayY/j52bm6wgWmZYF5yQklOiUUUuRj/huI=; b=dIzOGzP/xXC5gUNEk62493N0gAuc/wUzeXCQ9T8q93aT5JKyy4wUkfK5HQtIo+Herd ceIz8IlIA+CU1ljNRVPcQeBMO2SV5q4kkeB9yTNGriRvPDqqasIi2U5Z3yCQq5lSwF7h s9owORTXupHqiq0n3vN2Pw5MgYgkDnC72kcaxX90l47hNal59PyL49w4HihjRzmO3/v0 cf56qsBY8N2DXnRVJuacbGlwNQFgWGKp9NXD9wvbvulEd8l26MUYBB/nJaOPZ8LOi95i Rn3+6qUdchru9RpVNe//79W0CA2yj5Fo/XIrvQanw9ES+W/Bp9ub2sVrDeERV/wF5FlW Z27Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ax0Qs+QeRTBQoNMNCXu1WmO7Y7HZsGiz30ls73zIpbGqzCgM4 Wz2XyIZ42s93iAe1+9rzOWFpNk9e X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzx1tBGhOLJaejsy/GeGq52xBZoLtTTa1YQk4edqhCrhOhEh9l/3bNLPqGMx3Mh3ae6N6SN/Q== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:b7d5:: with SMTP id h204mr3694886wmf.100.1592320150295; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 08:09:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o18sm4677220wme.19.2020.06.16.08.09.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 16 Jun 2020 08:09:09 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun To: George Clemmer Subject: Re: Using --manfistest with /manifest files In-Reply-To: <85eeqf152a.fsf@gmail.com> References: <338KGSFKQGP1E.23382XUCMS8T3@wilsonb.com> <87v9juwvn0.fsf@gnu.org> <85ftav206f.fsf@gmail.com> <86blljs64k.fsf@gmail.com> <85eeqf152a.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 17:09:08 +0200 Message-ID: <86ftavqc8b.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::32f; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x32f.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, elaexuotee@wilsonb.com Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=eBIpu1wQ; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: mPylJziIgUva Dear, On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 at 10:03, George Clemmer wrote: > "manifest" occurs ~600 times in the ./guix directory. I am guessing its > use is deeply embedded with developers. If so, renaming it internally > seems like a bad idea. And if we write our internal manifest into the > profile and call it "specifications" it will only add the confusion. > > OTOH, "manifest" occurs only ~50 times in guix.info and the "user API" > seems limited to the --manifest option and the functions: > specifications->manifest and packages->manifest. Furthermore it is a new > concept for new users. So I don't think users care what we call it. Thank your for checking. You convince me. :-) All the best, simon