From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id eLWOAj7MgV8PTgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 14:59:10 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id KJfeOT3MgV+gfgAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 14:59:09 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE7369404D1 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 14:59:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:35210 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kRGKx-0001JH-DO for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 10:59:07 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56680) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kRGKI-0000gp-6M for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 10:58:27 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::431]:38850) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kRGKD-0003rL-9z; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 10:58:24 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id n18so13349467wrs.5; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 07:58:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=U7nsaIMont0Dd0gOaaKi76Z4hLSl0+ovtDt39OFMqn4=; b=CFC6regDiMZ1Hk5r4zijZt7t4jWNbW/vmodJIJXYtkuUFykkr+RVFCf2NJY7UxiU1v Vr6jigoa1AVgPmesJ7wxmpbF2YqF+w/NfL7b8YJC84B79ySxeo5XW+GpZKXBjBBBftVS OEiX6rTe+4D/QxrsuKVAj51Pg+U91LqkBGrmypJVz6CxE0dAfmDqQdTsx7NCxaXqPXuo ORN+scp1u+jSyMp7NBMXZ4ew/oi5tKA1Wol6q0MKlaNRBIVtvkbgIvRoBN6/VoBtpXkY 06wcyngV25A3z1HdGGmNPIi7yKpnGf2S6+/uiAgDBeJV/r9Y/w0C8PPnKubbayN3gCJg tmXA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=U7nsaIMont0Dd0gOaaKi76Z4hLSl0+ovtDt39OFMqn4=; b=ncxiftFiRw96grd6Bx0hNpqBaRu3gNC4bT4OyZbLk6VBN+TlXu1uK0S4jMwLmZhIW4 U8sJhY+/0OiW66aoZiPzyIG3VYjLFLrFKUF/1JGS7gejUaBQ3i9sKa3ufGmqkMEybvUU DdqoaPWJtFFm3EXdPuAHY7Jp6hAi+fvmRiZ5HtwL4Qku3+gvURhMitDt/MYZA7qFlFYA dIr/HTsXiPL+hdBj4GLKD2+Z25qsun9mwnoE8hryKWp7cIB1zeK4jxIv+UXyQFPo3hFB 94A7ntnqpbw6Vu/SzWtzHKCCAqGl4cpUzouyVcWfInBn819RG4Eis8tEQwWgTfPC57X1 AADg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531IElmfTk+uFfZZKuGkRbZsB992NfhMDrDht0+xiY7NIvg4rS0b 4G3cLNnCkryUf7QPn3a5vE4i65yeoUw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz2tb+KPeLOVEkrPjk+qTBhnoSpQCmud5tkm8nEaH/AiNiSuoqouEtahG4OCZ2UWFPBtMl9qw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5602:: with SMTP id l2mr1044511wrv.211.1602341897664; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 07:58:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d4sm16740437wrp.47.2020.10.10.07.58.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 10 Oct 2020 07:58:16 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun To: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: File search progress: database review and question on triggers In-Reply-To: <87mu0u5ugq.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> References: <87sgcuh8rb.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <86imd4e7cr.fsf@gmail.com> <87eenspcf8.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <865z94dz83.fsf@gmail.com> <87zh6gns4l.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87zh5c7hx6.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87k0w4zw8q.fsf@gnu.org> <875z7oijxu.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87mu0u5ugq.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2020 16:58:13 +0200 Message-ID: <86blhaqgai.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::431; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x431.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel , Mathieu Othacehe Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=CFC6regD; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.59 X-TUID: wJz3hii3mMmE Hi, On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 at 10:57, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > Of course, `guix filesearch` hasn't been implemented yet ;) Sorry, I have overlooked the status. :-) > We still need to decide whether we want to make it part of `guix search' > or define a separate command. >From my point of view, it would be better to include it under =E2=80=9Cguix search=E2=80=9D. Even, from my point of view, the code about =E2=80=9Csear= ch=E2=80=9D in =E2=80=9Cguix package=E2=80=9D should go in =E2=80=9Cguix search=E2=80=9D. Well do the o= pposite of the current: =E2=80=9Cguix package =E2=80=93search=E2=80=9D becoming an alias o= f =E2=80=9Cguix search=E2=80=9D in term of code. Anyway. :-) Cheers, simon