From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id cHKAOE4veGIA1gAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 08 May 2022 22:59:58 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6OJqOE4veGJ0+QAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 08 May 2022 22:59:58 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C1D52F14A for ; Sun, 8 May 2022 22:59:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39086 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nno0T-0002s5-FD for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 08 May 2022 16:59:57 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33484) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nno0E-0002ri-6V for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2022 16:59:42 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x333.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::333]:35607) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nno0C-0007XB-Go; Sun, 08 May 2022 16:59:41 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-x333.google.com with SMTP id c190-20020a1c35c7000000b0038e37907b5bso9761997wma.0; Sun, 08 May 2022 13:59:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=m0mv9gGvh8ifVXCG7RWhzLdNaQelJpG3aIlEP5NgV2k=; b=QofYeslprxOfXevO9MWwLq4eKTbI7sxtjeQ2loNHDY0VYB89mDpmyYVMasSztYTboc 32RW5ao1c0ks6E0vIsYxwN/l9dWpuc64O0eC5mGfMMX+3QTDAMFYXQSuCY5C/wOA15An oZY4IGRSzM2x4ddksxsfzkXmuv0SwwtEPHxMvkZ5A2gZY9nFJoNkG0A56tnmB0YAshQA L/1jFZmojWMJZLCOw/rvGetpOJfp4LZCwynkIqXnrTWAmp7eb0QesIiVnyYRX2qLVvmL uE3jzQAkjeCDTFJ9ewtkRw1LbnN8g+75qhQz4OuzRDiZNpSggWgqH1UhQ+2BfmT7i021 w36g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=m0mv9gGvh8ifVXCG7RWhzLdNaQelJpG3aIlEP5NgV2k=; b=CVvXT0X7Wo2OGto5Q+iwHLS4yAunTbhAgWxL5VJO1pVqEKV/c2hx3V024THneim0RK eEC3mw/dUL1r5rrbZ3rMxvoKK7h9loE28ew2a2l2miCZIZEZaN+vDOw6Wp0EqvtkIws4 X4Qj37NkChLXOKCU5WtgBq6skw/ExpM48n9+n8GHTx40pGiUVkSYTi1Avv2LX4Svfln7 dsglVAlYzzdRwiBf/e0hYzN25LX2eumvzj619oUo/WTZmf1Fjc2IgiYNmFLDE0O8d/zd CQ/TlE6rr+1bK4wtYFKORDdwYsUeKtw9KR4vuc4GUShZdAgnVSf7D40MDjZAp7TG2+Hz g9qg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5325dcAb6N4sLa7Q8UMHYqISELAlee89Ur4fgc0ylYkHRs/TIYUk k5IhlzRIrKXNp/rfWrQhTwGUZroBgcQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxrslmN9vekAya+NTHiEjINbnDc5YYqr4/lc9h2QppSiGYDUp5Fko8tW1QeuR4yA8LuYqBL4Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3041:b0:394:8835:2223 with SMTP id n1-20020a05600c304100b0039488352223mr5638415wmh.160.1652043577861; Sun, 08 May 2022 13:59:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili (2a01cb04061b8800e2568b9190e03e61.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr. [2a01:cb04:61b:8800:e256:8b91:90e0:3e61]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bk2-20020a0560001d8200b0020c5253d8d1sm8970000wrb.29.2022.05.08.13.59.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 08 May 2022 13:59:37 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun To: Arun Isaac , Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= Cc: Guix Devel , Kyle Meyer , Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: Mumi, public-inbox and tools In-Reply-To: <87czgo8scy.fsf@systemreboot.net> References: <87bkwf956h.fsf@gmail.com> <87v8umcxpq.fsf@systemreboot.net> <87a6btymzz.fsf@gnu.org> <87czgo8scy.fsf@systemreboot.net> Date: Sun, 08 May 2022 22:59:33 +0200 Message-ID: <86a6br68qy.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::333; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x333.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1652043598; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=m0mv9gGvh8ifVXCG7RWhzLdNaQelJpG3aIlEP5NgV2k=; b=lYzrwJ00IckSYFNGpi7KQ4zetjoruH6oBYDCzRO06gcU+OjyfjYZE/rSR2bzysVuJIyMBD w1kpJcyuEz8KtwpIQy/71ZzAwCAjYeH5s37dHgvci7WJGoCm1aitYKHV1/+V8+Df5aZAvU 85NrJgnmWnaNa/AQMv20OlachbN8ivZq/NAOe3i71o33IVj7ci6QZnb/4fysPwuZbqP8pL 3M4/Ra9yV/nxHf1XJZeky/RQgkE1XltMEAGmZVrtX3m5a6LoQay66yhhElW18pFW7Cqm8D nIAL9PCsrVMesGKLKy8xbxSKj+qSGk6mcx+zoUku2b+pOCu9fy3ljqeJddzZdw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1652043598; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=YmPhrZw8dK2VgSi9KUFdZ9zuYdzde/E0EJGEftUocnE3bZinVRoEEFrzM6dykuNSZMQGaw Y3nBSO5I8LjNc34ElPOk5VVlzXq1cK8UKAIE/B630KMFZzkAzwdpu5AEQPFZpV9qYIgn/U Tdjg0GaXG1gWr4lH0iSl7/Ho1DVXUDATwnVS+hnkWWAhWoi6Ib83Rb7qB3FbAxqSh9g8At HVodUqpJbXdrJqa0TZOR3Bjv3Iq4gRdjsvgHDqks5tBpQ6vC6xJwZbKkxrMWN4jfNseu+t 1bLCYYuLOU9MHFRGDRnneuFyJt2FbXtpFFk9QZj6QCZg1FmfJi/1UC05zCyNXw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=QofYeslp; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -9.51 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=QofYeslp; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 9C1D52F14A X-Spam-Score: -9.51 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: Nhr3PBM5Fh6B Hi Arun, On Sun, 08 May 2022 at 11:43, Arun Isaac wrote: > Hi Ludo, > >> The attached super-early-draft =E2=80=98guix review=E2=80=99 script fetc= hes mboxes from >> mumi=E2=80=94that part is OK. > > I like the idea! But, could we put this in mumi instead of guix? That > way, other packages that use debbugs/mumi (skribilo comes to mind), can > benefit from it as well. Something like Personally, I think such feature is a perfect candidate to Guix extensions. > Maybe, we should read some config file, say mumi.scm, from the top-level > directory of the current git repo to determine settings (think package > name, debbugs/mumi web URI, post-processing function to provide feedback > about the patch, etc.) specific to that repo. I agree that it deserves a config file. For instance, piem [1] uses something like, ("guix" :url "https://yhetil.org/guix" :address "guix-patches@gnu.org" :listid "guix-patches@gnu.org" :coderepo "~/src/guix/") 1: >> What=E2=80=99s more difficult is the rest: determining what=E2=80=99s a = patch and what=E2=80=99s >> not (I gather this is something that b4 and Patchwork handle nicely), >> getting the latest patch series, things like that. > > At some point, we should patch mumi to determine these. Determining the > latest patch series shouldn't be hard if we use the Date > header. guile-email will let us read any email header. Well, I think the general case is not easy. For an example of a complex thread and patch submission, consider this one: I have not tried to use B4 [2] on that one though. Somehow, I am not convinced that the Date header would be enough to identify the last patches. For instance, the first submission is a patch attached, then the others are inline, then comments are interleaved, etc. 2: IMHO, this determination requires some work. :-) That=E2=80=99s said, we could also agree that =E2=80=9Cmumi review=E2=80=9D= would only work when a set of rules (inline patches, base-commit, etc.) are applied. And for the other cases, the current manual patches application would be used. Somehow, constraint a set of rule would ease the automation and it appears to me an acceptable trade-off: it helps such automation and the work by reviewer and in addition we can still deal with the submissions not respecting such rules by reusing the =E2=80=9Claborious=E2=80=9D curren= t method. Cheers, simon