From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id CEsDGFfjtF/eCgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:03:19 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id QN/lE1fjtF89VQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:03:19 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 276279403EB for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:03:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:58256 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kfJN0-0004Aj-3j for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 04:03:18 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55346) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kfJBe-0004JO-BE for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 03:51:34 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]:37169) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kfJBb-0007f6-Oj for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 03:51:34 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id h21so1921008wmb.2 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 00:51:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=iPTKlF1Sg2QjMnYSJWclZ/ZnmYPXmfWsBXThlctzNPE=; b=tWf45QlSU8SO8HlaYYMUnfThHw+sa7GfUJ1+6+76UOzLTOHNc4Qu2sfhr7oVrMiu6e muWEEtVBbO6SVFecXgaJNNSt8G1ha63qssw/fSaTv6xCGg85VCg8peP7xz3YCIv7q06/ l6epBgRnBKePEfBU+CYAP7DXdabpq7OUo58+WusIfeV8saLn2qJddyu0tzllXK31bIP4 UXTrn41lL5sVzKe130cxKmTLD7wVS+iD+axC17TV/XlBfLiLYAloVNq64aB5djgR0Tv0 7ByMY01pwYfXETrQ+XXCHG/nQPmjddaMmCLFwblOxFy0102k/1Tc7MBqrD0TJoNwL4GC 2doA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iPTKlF1Sg2QjMnYSJWclZ/ZnmYPXmfWsBXThlctzNPE=; b=DPuPffg/5qjTDRhX77yPSSwnLR0cmEqmbE2+9u/3iW6GXF21mAhOBPY3ZCt3bE43ZL vHBhtWDiABnlH9dywIc1NEBWZngHkh0CvAUuCxKRyjS9y7SHeZfSapx2LK9olTg8DyOF ES0PoZVCot35xebPnPumAMSjVuow1dwAJu5YYDbN+j9Ubug7dS7PirAEX59vHZP8x8dB ay7loLQ8J+0Wzl2vAV5b721aqaBA6+lA9FXUmN7u2YJTfK9j6VSUwXiC8hCaYG+l9hUO gt26F9AJy/1Jl6jAuf+j46dDwE9YvM26tYGfFAkjzp+VVsEecKvSo5ZGm/O/Kmfq7OLJ aHmA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530iDBdnTwf6/p5FhweUjCqJj+C7A0IllQGN7zQhZawbHxvrrVAI xgHQhAHHX2MqMTfuZXOrk94tflyfUhPaAQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzNA89Io2+xVolKyo3t2MXFQ2Xs8GSRTil4WJ11MTgdNBAHfIOM4hvcY0tLJkj3of5oR77jzA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:b304:: with SMTP id c4mr3250246wmf.20.1605689488869; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 00:51:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c4sm11565308wrd.30.2020.11.18.00.51.28 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 18 Nov 2020 00:51:28 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun To: Guix Devel Subject: Re: Why unrelated package trigger rebuild? In-Reply-To: <86d01s89lj.fsf@gmail.com> References: <86d01s89lj.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:45:01 +0100 Message-ID: <868sazm4tu.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::32f; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x32f.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=tWf45QlS; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.71 X-TUID: Hr72OqTe7Yb6 Hi, For the interested reader, a quick cross-reference. On Fri, 09 Oct 2020 at 03:35, zimoun wrote: > From the Data Service: > > > > the commit 39222080911eaf3d7f74effe4467c1a04464aef3 which is about the > addition of the package =E2=80=99dkgpg=E2=80=99 modifies the hash of the = package > =E2=80=99ghc-haddock=E2=80=99 from: > > /gnu/store/s7s3ksfhkdbb6k6si8bjnxy8vvywv322-ghc-haddock-2.22.0 > > to: > > /gnu/store/j5llszq1cf12qn79bvhc042wc06ibfix-ghc-haddock-2.22.0 > > Well, I miss why the addition of one package changes the hash of another > unrelated one? Is it expected? The correct answer is because the Data Service deals with =E2=80=9Cstate=E2= =80=9D message of the mailing list guix-commits. Where =E2=80=9Cstate=E2=80=9D me= ans bunch of commits pushed in a row. Therefore, somehow it is expected. However, is it the behaviour we want is another question? :-) Explanations are here: and chat on IRC starting here: All the best, simon