From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id +AD1AgARZF8LdgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 01:44:32 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id oGE3Ov8QZF8NHwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 01:44:31 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89F21940291 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 01:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:45612 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJ5Ru-0003Vw-IP for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 21:44:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55878) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJ5Rj-0003Vp-2q for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 21:44:19 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::431]:45823) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJ5Rh-0004aB-5b; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 21:44:18 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id x14so3915380wrl.12; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 18:44:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/nNPKXsw5kbKMhcuaWtrW4MIpNC17AbM9QomGe5JFQk=; b=iHp4s7k/8f6ITQavKLHyPQtpfoS0IEMPGc6+NlfnzwWJc4WJPGMZg2A4Z5pH/5hy7V l8Xj/g+ArS/ObQ9B8Jzxxtzyh47oMmiobkAY6ildeSL0JQbuOFfiKWMRluYcrgOfGyZT 0fC/yxNqET1viGfaKm9BciQr+UHFSlLI+71PeEF6q1FaZSA8OTqcqdGNhJRJRBf50Qgz euzxQsHL7vCwhOmJkXzjLh7p+hJ2swKZ0+WdkYlLuo4gho8Ce/lh4ac0zUj+g+4vNvxA jumb3h5Xy3ykyqJmVQ6kPUmSNvA3WEpREgAVoQbUqaCczp0r+LwzPyHEifUv+FhITerd 58Lw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/nNPKXsw5kbKMhcuaWtrW4MIpNC17AbM9QomGe5JFQk=; b=sfn8jlCyextnz20KHKhwqNvDASzra8S6TO3Q19exmO03leycnRPYcz54NgQTGBs06p MXwQxlZcWHrWOtZmu7xwhgl5plN1yO+m1wRoa8X6japx0nd8/CbH3Vc4qB7cEpg0/wSC ac+DGTfTokOI4N4DuTII7gpajX05DBSUEiocBQD10WH7qLwuCRx1AL5qTwuTN/8W+b53 Z+lfIKc5l3fVC/EDWzZHL+TH94xv1nBjb8/l5FlRVoynzfyCyDaF51HZuqWHGymgoCIM MIKkvm/j1iYyZxeteofnjD6l0ljWO5cs9cA0qpdhUUICYHARhdAUxsZ+Sq0916SuSBsk 2Ceg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532eEViz3Cp4mrtHsvL+Ri4J7O3EHtxLw0yp20RV58CB5NTURgfa FttTBDN4WRbTUzXDGeJzccmGqmdPG7A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwei9RXyOxxGZYN7leUwfPqu7CjyQGGfHJA1UqpS0MfrCdO+s48Gw0PHEvLW6eFNLy93Mg26w== X-Received: by 2002:adf:8342:: with SMTP id 60mr38294801wrd.158.1600393454246; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 18:44:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([88.126.110.68]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g131sm2035185wmf.25.2020.09.17.18.44.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 17 Sep 2020 18:44:13 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: doc: Channel subsection order? In-Reply-To: <87een1n0a4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87een1n0a4.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 03:44:11 +0200 Message-ID: <867dsrzwno.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::431; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x431.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=iHp4s7k/; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.71 X-TUID: ydlIXWNsMfvE Hi Ludo, I propose something in #43482 . > 1. Move =E2=80=9CChannels=E2=80=9D to the top level, with real subsecti= ons as nodes. Patch 2 does that. > 2. Clearly distinguish between using a channel and developing a > channel. The former should come first. Patch 3 does that. > 3. Probably move =E2=80=98guix pull=E2=80=99 and =E2=80=98guix time-mac= hine=E2=80=99 under that > section. After a couple of read, I do not think they need to move under channels. Because they will not be visible from > 4. Add a tutorial-like section on how to work on your own channel. What do you have in mind? I only have in mind: test your change locally before pushing? All the best, simon