Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > Just a heads up that right now you *can* run Racket-on-Chez, but soon > Racket-on-Chez will be the "default"... maybe it's a good idea to see > how hard it will be to make a racket-on-chez package variant. > > I'm interested in looking at that but it'll probably have to be a while > before I can do so... if someone does so before me, I'll be interested > in beta testing at least. > > But also leaving this here as a self-reminder so we aren't surprised > when it becomes a more important thing to deal with :) > > Also, since we are talking about Racket, what happened to having a racket build system? -- Bonface M. K. Chief Emacs Mchochezi / Rieng ya software sare Curator of / Twitter: @BonfaceKilz GPG Key: D4F09EB110177E03C28E2FE1F5BBAE1E0392253F