From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id KHctC5/B0mF/XQAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 10:27:59 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id INHPB5/B0mHI/wAAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 10:27:59 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E94AA2219C for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 10:27:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:48004 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n4JdG-0004aG-6p for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 04:27:58 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54884) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n4Jbu-0003Qk-Ib for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 04:26:34 -0500 Received: from [2a00:1450:4864:20::335] (port=37818 helo=mail-wm1-x335.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n4Jbs-000596-Sh for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 04:26:34 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id a203-20020a1c7fd4000000b003457874263aso20814017wmd.2 for ; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 01:26:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=GxwhlU6JNlxckOKsH+NJdi4D9s7WEBn33CLWDCvDrC4=; b=YDqPxYRFUDFWIk2yoH52HmpHt805Z5RWPQKnkBDPf5HwszVSdY/LE1a+DOijBWVRLe Tu9gOzhwPD7vjIagr2Yz0kyimXbHPhCsDsTDfVGyOu5l1X/7NhooGMn+DSYTntXtBoKK fK6c6uPuF+O20fG2l4G4iBdIFwpz6ZHvWbf9MWICgd0D4/ABoSaLYDJs7+NthqZGb5+p vRP1Qw2VrjDDthbrMQuN3tvCCVS8fDp/6yh0xmG+6pXeNh8+WcT8/srYWgJWWBP8LK8D xDXcPfRWUpjjiDgmAoPwhwyF88ymyQ6CC5qCbQku1IzwsXI9dfGSa0KUKO1ci7OZ5zO0 Ej+A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GxwhlU6JNlxckOKsH+NJdi4D9s7WEBn33CLWDCvDrC4=; b=bBvN+7fWKVLFTvQttTNl6UsSb7y0Ib1XPXHVZhXHr+D6sa14MjmTrqDgy/5iq4r486 dohEx8XAY7A/vq/XYb/iRi30Mi56NCqO5J0BsMDHkALmWN+VRkvnzDRMs8rnI6gYGjbT 7IQ+Q5Ys2Pj2YpP6AWLmWBqq/fmLMndeF6EBp/8KM3QevDT903FUfAoK8UNeLdndEvel vn7LKXccm1fJVYHPCSiK97h9YDVs9HhKLwTp0vhPhyHPBhkHN8ArJOZtQ27mU6xFI80k 1xv5YJHTXLqY65fGSa3GWDTxUd+NpFvT6tUPiwik8znUrK+AgwlB2slrvWkZbU0Dgh8G b+ag== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533+KVdazkThWPAaVF/JXKCWEk3PpyXPtN5joHHVPcirhZ1vFhPB y86Y08MjLu7YjUv6aNNMQ+dyeLw4xOM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxeyPt6oOn3a84YOauApXx2QIpjcj/QI9VTo9HhccORl8gTA0QCvf0Qu26vpbt/0j8KVkruzA== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c198:: with SMTP id y24mr37582891wmi.1.1641201990485; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 01:26:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m15sm39335644wrw.27.2022.01.03.01.26.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 03 Jan 2022 01:26:29 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun To: Liliana Marie Prikler , Mark H Weaver , guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: On raw strings in commit field In-Reply-To: <86bf0d941ff6095961670a41478e603fa961e498.camel@gmail.com> References: <6e451a878b749d4afb6eede9b476e5faabb0d609.camel@gmail.com> <86y243kdoo.fsf@gmail.com> <899587fb6a76ddfa37d197d3d0fd23cdc7ad8592.camel@gmail.com> <867dbmi7pf.fsf@gmail.com> <3d448fe42f0c43574db96fa26aecd7da5fd5a95d.camel@gmail.com> <877dbkmjm9.fsf@netris.org> <762e9fb7116c442bf0f8f63221bf32fa2b77f2cf.camel@gmail.com> <87y240kq2i.fsf@netris.org> <9362c6fb7e34ded5d009c3f79cd18300d6cd539c.camel@gmail.com> <87r19rkx9h.fsf@netris.org> <86bl0url52.fsf@gmail.com> <86bf0d941ff6095961670a41478e603fa961e498.camel@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2022 10:22:26 +0100 Message-ID: <864k6lw4vh.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a00:1450:4864:20::335 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::335; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x335.google.com X-Spam_score_int: 6 X-Spam_score: 0.6 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (0.6 / 5.0 requ) DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1641202079; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=GxwhlU6JNlxckOKsH+NJdi4D9s7WEBn33CLWDCvDrC4=; b=HpgsN0uu8NaEoPQOWg5xML2voZAB6hTUMyhy3vu9sWhMsyy/v3/Y9FzTVO9zVGRu7dsq5X Qf20tS39w/0OoBpbG5OzrFSCCx2HQSX3XfZPWVd6a5RCAVcOKFWsjoVkWW2X8sCLDLrqZ4 M1SWTu436aX86ULp6i9Wvinfxo9PwNw7tdiQjJWkEWsxMIAGTFiyP7mGv/1hudUBihFjsF pI6973lxhLMoM5eEO+NnR7Cq4Pgt7OvvaJXZTl3vT6XrbNydnQ6AZHRkfxASybSZofhgbb HGvMcclmIFEdaeNZMMVGZbG53ZjlWrp+/pIHNtD1FL8oYjFe7w+wf9ioCaAlyA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1641202079; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=rV3A3FaO0B35/Zql/ojSZ52KFOvFk71bdPbwrfoJyOO7B4Ln8KAZFhPTTHsh4tbqzs3yWs Ee+WsLAYze4vsTEov9upIYaTCVPcLFC3k90+ZkKbOaCJRLIB7YM6Ulzkjgeg5dF6sYw3VY Jz1kFoNVGdeknMbyo++6FXbmblELg0VvexjzPqmuzOvM/8OCZJMyXezY8O4tN541liQtBN IXjZ5Mui4MGWwdgWeIsuNX3eowUztdFS22EuNUaRuh7QOqECMCpOlHWUGwtOBjlypAjOCc EfeSefUWLLesKBqDv754fxlV5bWtfvP2XAFNUcfJirFn/hzoL0C7Haq3k0JBNw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=YDqPxYRF; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.29 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=YDqPxYRF; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: E94AA2219C X-Spam-Score: -4.29 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: iuXsSTH7AvGf Hi Liliana, On Sun, 02 Jan 2022 at 22:35, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: >> The statement still appears to me wrong because Git commit hash only >> depends on the content itself. > > If you define content through the NAR hash used by Guix, I'm pretty > sure vanity commits invalidate that statement. I do not understand what it means =E2=80=93 not to say I think your comment= does not make sense at all. Well, I already took the time to explain twice how it works. Maybe you also deny the Git documentation saying =C2=ABGit is a content-addressable filesystem.=C2=BB I have the impression that you are trying to keep your statement by stretching how it concretely works. Instead of just say: =E2=80=9CMy bad, = I was going too far with the chosen-prefix attack of SHA-1=E2=80=9D. And that=E2= =80=99s fine because that=E2=80=99s a valid objection. (Even if I was already aware, mentioning such issue helps for a sane collective discussion, IMHO.) Other said, I totally miss why you are raising what now appears to me as bad faith. Anyway. For the rest, I could comment several items but I will not. I would repeat myself and other minor disagreements are not worth to put energy in for resolving. :-) Cheers, simon