From: Yasuaki Kudo <yasu@yasuaki.com>
To: david larsson <david.larsson@selfhosted.xyz>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org,
Guix-devel
<guix-devel-bounces+david.larsson=selfhosted.xyz@gnu.org>,
zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Building a software toolchain that works
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2022 08:59:26 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84055911-A849-4B0B-AA90-D1B9F4E94E4C@yasuaki.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <699ed5cd32d656ae03e05994026784e5@selfhosted.xyz>
Hello David,
I am huge fan of Guix on WSL2 and I used to use it a lot 😄. And yes, it should be documented well (or even better, the installation should be made super simple) while as you mentioned, it might be easier to do this in another community.
I don't share the ideology of hardline rejection of the use of proprietary software - I just need everything to be accountable, such as knowing which part of the system is Free and which isn't. (and of course more Free the merrier)
Guix, the software, (IMHO, not necessarily the community unless a separate one is created) does the most perfect job for this 😄
-Yasu
> On Mar 19, 2022, at 06:14, david larsson <david.larsson@selfhosted.xyz> wrote:
>
> On 2022-03-17 13:56, zimoun wrote:
>> Hi Olivier,
>>> On another note, what I find fascinating is why Guix and Nix are not
>>> more used in academic papers.
>> Indeed.
>> One part of the answer is, IMHO: it is difficult to spread the word.
>> For instance, with co-authors, we have tried to write a short paper
>> detailing what Guix solves, i.e., the computational environment part of
>> the “science crisis“, and targeting especially bioinfo folks. We got
>> many refusals by the journals that bioinfo folks indeed read and we end
>> in a “specialized” journal.
>> On the top of that, add the fact that most of the time, people use what
>> other people in their lab or collaborators already use.
>> On the top of that, add the fact that the story of Guix on Windows or
>> Mac is not really good. I am not arguing here, just to mention that
>> many people are still using Windows or Mac and few one Linux variant.
>> Therefore, all in all, the bootstrap of Guix is hard; as always. :-)
>> The initiative Guix-HPC is an attempt to address that. The name is
>> probably not fully representative since now it looks like Guix in
>> scientific context; HPC being only one component.
>> From my point of view, the bootstrap of Guix in scientific world
>> requires more documentation materials for many common use cases and more
>> popular applications or usual scientific stack. For instance PyTorch in
>> Guix is one step but many things are still really hard to do with Guix
>> when it is not elsewhere. Another instance is RStudio for bioinfo folks
>> – it does not work out of the box with Guix when it does elsewhere.
>> Help in these both areas – howto materials and popular applications – is
>> very welcome. :-)
>> Join the fun, join guix-science@gnu.org :-)
>> Cheers,
>> simon
>
> I run Guix including GUI applications from Windows via WSL2 (Windows Subsystem for Linux). It may help some to try it out if this setup was easier and more documented, though I suppose that is somewhat prevented to go via official channels by the FSDG guidelines.
>
> Best regards,
> David
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-18 23:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-14 19:05 Building a software toolchain that works Ryan Prior
2022-03-14 20:26 ` Pjotr Prins
2022-03-14 21:40 ` David Arroyo
2022-03-15 8:19 ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-03-17 9:20 ` zimoun
2022-03-16 14:02 ` Josselin Poiret
2022-03-16 15:28 ` Ryan Prior
2022-03-16 20:13 ` Yasuaki Kudo
2022-03-17 15:35 ` Maxime Devos
2022-03-17 16:56 ` David Arroyo
2022-03-14 23:57 ` Olivier Dion via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
2022-03-15 8:23 ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-03-15 8:42 ` Pjotr Prins
2022-03-15 12:32 ` Yasuaki Kudo
2022-03-17 12:56 ` zimoun
2022-03-18 21:13 ` david larsson
2022-03-18 23:59 ` Yasuaki Kudo [this message]
2022-03-19 13:02 ` Windows Subsystem for Linux zimoun
2022-03-24 21:14 ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-03-25 3:43 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2022-03-25 9:04 ` Phil
2022-03-25 10:14 ` Oliver Propst
2022-03-17 20:04 ` Building a software toolchain that works Katherine Cox-Buday
2022-03-18 6:27 ` Pjotr Prins
2022-03-18 9:10 ` Oliver Propst
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-03-17 12:06 zimoun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84055911-A849-4B0B-AA90-D1B9F4E94E4C@yasuaki.com \
--to=yasu@yasuaki.com \
--cc=david.larsson@selfhosted.xyz \
--cc=guix-devel-bounces+david.larsson=selfhosted.xyz@gnu.org \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).