From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id 8Cy7HUyvf2ahIwEA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2024 06:53:00 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id 8Cy7HUyvf2ahIwEA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2024 08:53:00 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=MYnAgh+0; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1719643980; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=gPH4raKhPThpO8RHRzqE70k7xlIU52mRafR37bk97Gc=; b=pUKqNhNUd7mTodHawBV37yv72WalzAUAy7K0FdNTQXrTpbRI0IMcYh9pt585/2yTtLSZj9 jw9mmhJwkXHSDNP1INyD1BDPgEenkIHFoquphuAJCAW6pdxpLlWoXPRa9MCUszPVHRsr2o QXg+8CgzBfMPyAh5J8AS8byJ1wb3Lkrh+ksfC06LHDDoRvod4CeCJIC9+WDy/wmjSI9kVY piFVLP9UjrUAP3SpGlHIOppTg35pcGs8pmTfK3lSmWi7OmBGLObgDyeZUIbfDdQYiSKh5A EKq2y/CnYmVdOi6BgvmqoThHtJe9U2HIGfja0XvAeCPhm8Ow1qvMFUyAXRuFFA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=MYnAgh+0; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1719643980; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=E2qLp+H49iGuGb6HXV3VZec1wpS8WpX0HdGy6dDEy/fv7wh3mJJwfhhy9ZpBh+cfwwZ26x AzU8PhQy65bC2W1fTfMZtBsKsalZ6UtVYB0cUt8f66KVv9ps2BCSiXvq4qCSbazLwe3RI3 dtZR54XvJ4s4tnC8VtCsH2y2CZVYezoQMdGDOJPXrnmR5Tv6Q2V5w8jePLeMgDDxZLGWoM 1Xc+ciJkvj/UVkTMddzSdU/n2iyI6lpvOSsQ6TlL8MPWu0sZ1CZHBqqJFqcEAw0s97oFwg wTJTsbfFJXZTwf/eMF6RLh6xzMJbZyQtgE9A+gqE2bBxB/DfTPReOAhmcG2BwQ== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3087621E92 for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2024 08:53:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sNRwU-0002L6-Tv; Sat, 29 Jun 2024 02:52:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sNRwT-0002Kr-KH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2024 02:52:13 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x244.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::244]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sNRwO-0002Nn-0p for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2024 02:52:13 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-x244.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2ec3f875e68so13822721fa.0 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 23:52:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1719643925; x=1720248725; darn=gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gPH4raKhPThpO8RHRzqE70k7xlIU52mRafR37bk97Gc=; b=MYnAgh+0Uf1xX21Ipyej+hQbK0XQnSlWDVYdKr5aKXF86mMZpHo2IOnKU+aeZrLlwt XzJmsZChEtDLHwOBN6TBNfhS3Ux4n+B5QmPJEL5N8510aMyUvwoXurZ9BVg2TPIIALtC 5xl2UiWU5BixHmzujwOZETMNPQhHs3wEe35jKkH1LrRv1qSP+7ZcRTrlYVzQrUI0XWCt xu1cfvuzRkIq1oMeQhijkkUzAW7bvNuN3gKH2jti2A2RiQnLEw9s0y1u/8Uc2Vyh//LW qxbQCmWlFrrdCKNl1BJDrMZnGdNIYDJuK3To0mpvvlpX+46oU5urM81je9QXSE1Uq7d+ tbSg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1719643925; x=1720248725; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gPH4raKhPThpO8RHRzqE70k7xlIU52mRafR37bk97Gc=; b=w2Szo8xkEXGpkSAjFoOFfrI7ORXmIqUnriqsWh4CO0kkRx538Xlibw8ui3HIfoxVxC 6/OddoI5dlc55x8Q0yISKtJrvbMz1koC+SWUcXjyQ6mf/nNTAh6Xi9xH5zp1I9PsELkk ZG/jtrPs9twYPWui0V2jsS3Dec/t9ugFfIiv4zmQTSbkvWFpXbzApydXgvOHoEQuyT/0 vWn4pjADWiheeCveTCVd139rr3pZcRF8N6t6oQBfIjnDqVmT1Sl0RrLk1wPAnR/9WLuc VXFQZEvwgPclPEKymXnMbsCQTu5t0JYFGAyuo01J9zi9hHVOPUIv3OSNuGN/iFRKLWTZ j//Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwOHLIjqnj8Ka81CtFTJHLn3kvziQMmyE+cCjun6cN3bmjw7YYX bbaKavyFWS1kKn+G9GOwRCr9vgW/wZYS4ao/40DEN9E2W2iDrTmz7xgotQUQ X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGukpiULQiSChEZzm2Gr2h9b//hk1cgTzzpe3GhS+v1jqfdOJDyxTHGcRJ2u9SvXdqFPZeOxA== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9e52:0:b0:2ec:4f6b:de70 with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2ee5e380109mr2420861fa.23.1719643924900; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 23:52:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lumine.fritz.box (85-127-52-93.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.52.93]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-4256af55d0fsm63502395e9.19.2024.06.28.23.52.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 28 Jun 2024 23:52:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <833a84d6421dca2f91c80668430a03b445c91475.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Codifying/Documenting Guix commit message conventions? From: Liliana Marie Prikler To: Maxim Cournoyer , Richard Sent Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 08:51:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: <877ce8a6yh.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87bk3mvvfy.fsf@freakingpenguin.com> <877ce8a6yh.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::244; envelope-from=liliana.prikler@gmail.com; helo=mail-lj1-x244.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Spam-Score: -8.72 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 3087621E92 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -8.72 X-TUID: zfdWCssDzq7W Hi Guix, Am Freitag, dem 28.06.2024 um 21:11 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer: > Richard Sent writes: >=20 > > Another one seems to be the [security fixes], [fixes CVE-...], and > > [fixes TROVE-...] blocks added to certain header lines. What other > > tags exist? There seems to be inconsistency here when referring to > > multiple CVEs. For example, when a fixes tag references multiple > > CVEs you can find. > >=20 > > [fixes CVE-2020-10700, CVE-2020-10704]=C2=A0 [5] > > [fixes CVE-2020-3898 & CVE-2019-8842]=C2=A0=C2=A0 [6] > > [fixes CVE-2023-{28755, 28756}]=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0 [7] >=20 > I think these are likely to bust the 70 characters limit for a git > commit summary line, so perhaps we could standardize on [fixes CVE- > XXX] for single CVEs or [security fixes] when there are more than one > (listing the CVEs in the commit message body instead then). I think we should use a "Fixes: [short description] " footer for both Guix and upstream bugs, that can easily be parsed =E2=80=93 hopefully = by both humans and machines. That would give the interested reader the (contextual) information they need, while also leaving the main body to a more thorough description of the patch itself. Cheers >=20