From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id qLjuCpiE416IQwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 13:35:20 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id ONS/BpiE415rWwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 13:35:20 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC95C940602 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 13:35:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:55112 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jjjq2-0000q4-Jj for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 09:35:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39924) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jjjpt-0000pf-Sp for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 09:35:10 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu ([89.234.186.109]:38066) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jjjpr-0003ug-ML for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 09:35:09 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id e60afe50; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 13:35:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=lepiller.eu; h=date :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:to:from:message-id; s=dkim; bh=yKUeUmaiUx/3mHzCqSrSssCvRiK3TXGm8n/MZSpyW8Y=; b=hf3ygOG+JTQG vJOTs3PNn1H5oya/qiH+60ZhqIyrPHURRPdjSqNlxrA3bX8a37ucvClftEarTfMJ ez+Yal+AeuRd4HO+Gf16Is+WNfqKajzgmvvT3DzcLP1EXleLMmdAecM15m2GsdjM +oMIX6nJz+n+akMIGjZwS+l9Sjqclb6C6eqBP9fFKsaHi0zjxGt3ywD8FdKg8wEI PhTMpwGRUAbfMWAujxpR4ZFcXPLGvqRuk9Ci1YUvlumGGInos4ZDZdsbA267+w1M plCGkxbYt95oq/MOVfL/O9uwhfeqapotkDPrIKDaauERJjmQbtCm9Zp+Don2WGT5 tUVlpd3vtA== Received: by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 95b12a33 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 12 Jun 2020 13:35:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 09:34:51 -0400 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <87tuzgpgjv.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> References: <87d064slev.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <898699F6-0111-41F0-826B-4A1C78F933EE@lepiller.eu> <87tuzgpgjv.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Reducing LLVM closure size To: Pierre Neidhardt ,guix-devel@gnu.org From: Julien Lepiller Message-ID: <80AFA6B5-2FAD-40EE-8AF5-8783EA6BB8D9@lepiller.eu> Received-SPF: none client-ip=89.234.186.109; envelope-from=julien@lepiller.eu; helo=lepiller.eu X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/12 08:01:56 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=lepiller.eu header.s=dkim header.b=hf3ygOG+; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=lepiller.eu; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.71 X-TUID: 2NwdV4RvSV/I Le 12 juin 2020 09:19:48 GMT-04:00, Pierre Neidhardt = a =C3=A9crit : >Julien Lepiller writes: > >>>By the way, this looks like a bug: >>> >>>--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >>>> guix refresh -l llvm >>>Building the following package would ensure 3 dependent packages are >>>rebuilt: clang-toolchain@10=2E0=2E0 >>>--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >>> >>>Why is only 1 package displayed? >> >> Because these are the dependants for llvm@10, but the default llvm is >llvm@9: >> >> guix refresh -l llvm@9 >> Building the following 1180 packages would ensure 2092 lependent >packages are rebuilt: =E2=80=A6 > >This does not explain why it says "3 dependent packages" but lists only >one! :) Because building this one will also rebuild the other two, re-read the sen= tence carefully :) llvm -> clang -> clang-toolchain