From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: csanchezdll@gmail.com (Carlos =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A1nchez?= de La Lama) Subject: binutils depends on bash for powerpc Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 11:44:40 +0200 Message-ID: <7tk2cwyd87.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59183) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byyHm-0007cn-Ss for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:44:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byyHj-0007x5-S5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:44:46 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22c]:37217) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byyHj-0007wk-Lp for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:44:43 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id c78so13481713wme.0 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 02:44:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from boole (galileo.kdpof.com. [88.26.201.16]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ma5sm23995392wjb.47.2016.10.25.02.44.41 for (version=TLS1_1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Oct 2016 02:44:41 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi all, I am still trying to bootstrap powerpc-linux-gnu. Already on the target machine, my problem is binutils on powerpc-linux installs a shell script (bin/embedspu). Currently, binutils does not depend on bash, but binutils-final (the implicit binutils for gnu build system) has bootstrap-coreutils as input. The result is an unallowed reference from binutils to bootstrap-binaries, making the build fail. I have solved it by adding static-bash-for-glibc as input for binutils-final, but I was wondering whether it made sense to completely change "bash" from bootstrap-bash to static-bash-for-glibc on %boot-inputs2 and later, thus making easier to ensure dependencies on bootstrap-bash are not carried on. Thoughts? BR Carlos