From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id oP3FHqQ7Wl/pEgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:43:48 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id mLHcGqQ7Wl8iLwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:43:48 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9F5C94028F for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:53204 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGNne-0001mQ-EF for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:43:46 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57666) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGNnS-0001h2-Qe; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:43:34 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60015) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGNnS-0001Qt-AB; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:43:34 -0400 Received: from [143.121.198.62] (port=49658 helo=cog147) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kGNnR-0005ua-RQ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:43:34 -0400 Message-ID: <7aae0301ae59d6b2fbf46a9c5776de12472ca4d6.camel@gnu.org> Subject: Re: branch master updated: gnu: Add r-bisquerna. From: Roel Janssen To: Ricardo Wurmus Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:43:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87blid6f72.fsf@elephly.net> References: <20200909150314.13619.80121@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <874ko76ins.fsf@elephly.net> <87blid6f72.fsf@elephly.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, guix-commits@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.99 X-TUID: DJ0ep9kq4bb5 On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 13:31 +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Roel Janssen writes: > > > > > +(define-public r-bisquerna > > > > + (package > > > > + (name "r-bisquerna") > > > > + (version "1.0.4") > > > > + (source (origin > > > > + (method url-fetch) > > > > + (uri (cran-uri "BisqueRNA" version)) > > > > + (sha256 > > > > + (base32 > > > > + "01g34n87ml7n3pck77497ddgbv3rr5p4153ac8ninpgjijl > > > > m3jw > > > > 2")))) > > > > > > Why is this in (gnu packages bioinformatics) and not in (gnu > > > packages > > > cran)? > > > > It seemed so "bioinformatics"-specific. But you're right, it's a > > CRAN > > package, so that may be a better fit. Shall I move it to CRAN? > > If you have time to do that, yes please. Some time ago I started a > half-hearted migration of R packages from (gnu packages > bioinformatics) > to (gnu packages cran) and (gnu packages bioconductor). It’s not > supremely important, but I think in the long term we’d like to have > CRAN > things in (gnu packages cran) and Bioconductor things in (gnu > packages > bioconductor), because it’s deliciously unsurprising. :) I fully agree that it would be nice to have all packages originating from CRAN in (gnu packages cram) and all things Bioconductor in (gnu packages bioconductor). I moved r-bisquerna and lowercased its synopsis in 66be746dc0c0f4ba3d748ed8d0983b2f9afdace8. Kind regards, Roel Janssen