From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id oHDNKz5hPmDzRgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 16:01:02 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id GOmkJz5hPmCjewAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 16:01:02 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05B881AD62 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 17:01:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:58766 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lH7SG-0003kl-T8 for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 11:01:00 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58042) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lH7Rz-0003kE-76 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 11:00:43 -0500 Received: from lepiller.eu ([2a00:5884:8208::1]:33576) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lH7Rx-0004cP-0c; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 11:00:42 -0500 Received: from lepiller.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id e26046b3; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 16:00:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=lepiller.eu; h=date :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:to:from:message-id; s=dkim; bh=4rP8T/rh2Mn9sebsIWo7wHs1JNL6rzpoZDgUkH2K2To=; b=UfBB2KtEWGzv AqqlUa9iuUaTEOpQ4BuDj/Gjp2ixTshTb9Us3jK5Mdsq9d6gO0Nwiszb+yxrH0kR ZVyfbo6UnmoC101Sm+HK1D1RBLLI1a7irh/x9+fW9p8AhmfhzrNOwlj8QQYkSsmL tot/iEo6AdoIVxlH9HQl4NVMDrth2cpDZp0em86Mwnf9ZozrIvEW56zXAqL1/hwf aDxYyS0fKCNMWRsdO6Qe+ORyVTY7hJj/H/sjGQbSrEdQQOSVL7RVc97rf+TYTOyJ ghabuBWp03oPMO3k38bt9VM/slCG0UlUC9N7WYrn2CwlBwPgGYI+BiT+dncOcJeb /PLnBQQYQA== Received: by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 398e8299 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Tue, 2 Mar 2021 16:00:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2021 11:00:18 -0500 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----LAAQEHFSC47C0YJRYBJS0NOAO813HL" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Release on April 18th? To: guix-devel@gnu.org, zimoun , Guix Devel From: Julien Lepiller Message-ID: <7F1C8AF8-8984-4E57-BDE5-61F2651586C9@lepiller.eu> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:5884:8208::1; envelope-from=julien@lepiller.eu; helo=lepiller.eu X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1614700862; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=ntCSl32NwhBywBgyNE2y888zsQHfDcxO979zHz3EqZg=; b=NQep7TpcPpG80xZDC6HF8l3NgcLhMz7q7PpNqctucJKPASKaWhvByzfUV3x6mwpySbHl+s Jn9p3xKOhRxV+abkUNBt8L7YBalSKW1O1WJyvLWNsmtZGHb7zyjp6tH1LSIHLHVPbkM9nk FHI7JpUOz+4/uEQW5vAOXRG9Nql0TGys82azjLBGkqmWw+wrgDYIHCQoZS0FYr+vZDteCx 780J0WGJ05+/BBau1zJ+BQZ7JU65zCfA3iiIiwFP87Zc1i6m+ypmMLfdoCKCZ9NJw7VFm/ NHnPv/0tE/5BdwA0cMbEnIgHz0ekOg5YBBrI3YEEIzS2G1QnRtFJCwT9gDmcsw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1614700862; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=chnadSEBmD28X+of70umGNiPbCm8mTrZFfLXrYkLohrjGw+wg2Coxh1F1T/jYXXmfNrnIu i47eensSL22G1svouBLXuYq2uovQzO51cMdLSuwjrJK5gfsdZFsCqGS6i4loBLoRGIpe/i P8uWQrlA2q6c6c+0zbeTfD2kov6EP+QnYgV+mGdwr3EjYCvxvdeusJrLOk/SQw3FwRib+D MlZ7ytMRFPulCcr4ASJ6rs0pKvvPqXJ2j5pDjN9RrWno2B8f0f+J/GWcB1JWZQJ5vHPxfM bDrH58WEo6YRTJ1l9FoKU8pP/mQF8m+xebINYwK8XchWiS6cU0bIr+rfx/rpzQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=lepiller.eu header.s=dkim header.b=UfBB2KtE; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -0.26 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=lepiller.eu header.s=dkim header.b=UfBB2KtE; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=lepiller.eu (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 05B881AD62 X-Spam-Score: -0.26 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: CO3NCzZzY41K ------LAAQEHFSC47C0YJRYBJS0NOAO813HL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On the translation side of things, we now have an almost rolling-release mo= del, so deadline is fine=2E We need to figure out a date for a string freez= e if we want to have good coverage for the release=2E Maybe a week before ? For the date, I'd like to make sure we have some time to clean the afterma= ths of the core-updates merge, so maybe two or three weeks after it would b= e good=2E If we do not merge core-updates yet, then we can release earlier = than that=2E Le 2 mars 2021 09:51:33 GMT-05:00, zimoun a= =C3=A9crit : >Hi, > >I would like to propose to release on April 18th (anniversary of the >"Initial commit=2E")=2E It could be 1=2E2=2E1 or 1=2E3=2E Well, from my >understanding, if core-updates is merged it makes sense to have 1=2E3 >otherwise 1=2E2=2E1 seems reasonable=2E WDYT? > >I have kept an eye on the Bug Tracker and I am not seeing any blocker >but I could have missed something, especially on the core-updates >side=2E > >Is it doable to have core-updates merged in the next weeks? Or not at >all=2E > >About translators? WDYT about this deadline? > > >Let me know what do you think=2E > >All the best, >simon ------LAAQEHFSC47C0YJRYBJS0NOAO813HL Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On the translation side of things, we now have an = almost rolling-release model, so deadline is fine=2E We need to figure out = a date for a string freeze if we want to have good coverage for the release= =2E Maybe a week before ?

For the date, I'd like to make sure we hav= e some time to clean the aftermaths of the core-updates merge, so maybe two= or three weeks after it would be good=2E If we do not merge core-updates y= et, then we can release earlier than that=2E

Le 2 mars 2021 09:51:33 GMT-05:00, zimoun <zimon=2Etoutoune@gmail=2E= com> a =C3=A9crit :
Hi,

I would like to propose to release on Apr= il 18th (anniversary of the
"Initial commit=2E")=2E It could be 1=2E2= =2E1 or 1=2E3=2E Well, from my
understanding, if core-updates is merged= it makes sense to have 1=2E3
otherwise 1=2E2=2E1 seems reasonable=2E W= DYT?

I have kept an eye on the Bug Tracker and I am not seeing any b= locker
but I could have missed something, especially on the core-updates=
side=2E

Is it doable to have core-updates merged in the next wee= ks? Or not at all=2E

About translators? WDYT about this deadline?<= br>

Let me know what do you think=2E

All the best,
simon
------LAAQEHFSC47C0YJRYBJS0NOAO813HL--