From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julie Marchant Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ungoogled-chromium. Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 18:59:02 -0500 Message-ID: <794ccf8b-cee1-5588-976f-085d37a0bc2a@riseup.net> References: <20190202192023.22087-1-mbakke@fastmail.com> <87k1igpwk8.fsf@dismail.de> <20190203235204.63970587@parabola> <87sgx3mbcq.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvhf5f8d.fsf@dustycloud.org> Reply-To: Workgroup for fully free GNU/Linux distributions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87tvhf5f8d.fsf@dustycloud.org> Content-Language: en-CA List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gnu-linux-libre-bounces+gldg-gnu-linux-libre=m.gmane.org@nongnu.org Sender: "gnu-linux-libre" To: Workgroup for fully free GNU/Linux distributions , Christopher Lemmer Webber , =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=c3=a8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 28004@debbugs.gnu.org List-Id: guix-devel.gnu.org On 02/07/2019 06:52 PM, Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: >=20 >> Hi bill-auger, >> >> bill-auger skribis: >> >>> re: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2019-02/msg00009.ht= ml >>> >>> i would like to remind readers of the guix-devel list that it was >>> discussed some months ago, why no FSDG distros currently distribute >>> chromium[1] - it appeared at that time, that most people in that >>> discussion were in agreement that chromium should not be included in >>> guix; and marius was instead hosting it in a private repo, as not to >>> taint the main guix repos with dubious software - has there been a >>> notable break-through since then? >> >> It=E2=80=99s not entirely clear to me what the problems are, to be hon= est. >> Marius listed specific issues that were addressed by the patches; othe= rs >> then pointed out at additional issues that ungoogled-chromium fixes, >> which Marius took into account; what=E2=80=99s left now? >> >> I understand you=E2=80=99re skeptical about Chromium, but we cannot ba= se >> decisions based on vague skepticism. If you know of issues that are >> still unaddressed, please do list them. >> >> I=E2=80=99d also like to stress that, if Chromium is eventually includ= ed in >> Guix, we are committed to fixing it or removing it should someone late= r >> discover that it does not comply with the FSDG (that=E2=80=99s the =E2= =80=9CCommitment >> to Correct Mistakes=E2=80=9D section of FSDG.) >=20 > +1 ... If concrete problems are found, by all means those should be > raised and addressed. Otherwise I really think we ought to merge this > work. Yes, exactly. --=20 Julie Marchant http://onpon4.github.io Encrypt your emails with GnuPG: https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org