From: "Cook, Malcolm" <MEC@stowers.org>
To: "'Ludovic Courtès'" <ludo@gnu.org>, "Andreas Enge" <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: Guix-devel <Guix-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: RE: New ‘guix graph’ command
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 20:55:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <774083cc97244ca8abd19f56733239f2@exchsrv2.sgc.loc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878u8n1b9u.fsf@gnu.org>
Hi,
I like the request.
I think the dependent packages should be pointed to.
In this way, each node in the graph and its outgoing arrows reflect the contents of a single package.
~Malco
> -----Original Message-----
> From: guix-devel-bounces+mec=stowers.org@gnu.org [mailto:guix-devel-
> bounces+mec=stowers.org@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Ludovic Courtès
> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 3:47 PM
> To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
> Cc: Guix-devel <Guix-devel@gnu.org>
> Subject: Re: New ‘guix graph’ command
>
> Hey!
>
> Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:
>
> > Very neat indeed! A tiny bit of nitpicking: Would it not be preferable
> > if the arrows were reversed, from the inputs to the dependent packages?
>
> Dunno, maybe the graph people would choose the other direction but I like it
> this way, looks more “intuitive” to me. What do people think?
>
> Ludo’.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-03 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-26 22:53 New ‘guix graph’ command Ludovic Courtès
2015-08-27 9:25 ` Pjotr Prins
2015-08-27 10:58 ` Mathieu Lirzin
2015-08-27 11:26 ` Ludovic Courtès
2015-08-27 15:15 ` Alex Kost
2015-08-27 15:20 ` Leo Famulari
2015-08-27 15:34 ` Thompson, David
2015-08-27 20:55 ` Ludovic Courtès
2015-08-27 21:01 ` Thompson, David
2015-09-03 20:32 ` Andreas Enge
2015-09-03 20:46 ` Ludovic Courtès
2015-09-03 20:54 ` Thompson, David
2015-09-03 20:55 ` Cook, Malcolm [this message]
2015-09-04 8:13 ` Pjotr Prins
2015-09-04 9:49 ` Andreas Enge
2015-09-11 0:02 ` Cyril Roelandt
2015-09-11 7:19 ` Leo Famulari
2015-09-11 12:26 ` Ludovic Courtès
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=774083cc97244ca8abd19f56733239f2@exchsrv2.sgc.loc \
--to=mec@stowers.org \
--cc=Guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=andreas@enge.fr \
--cc=ludo@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).