From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller.eu>
Subject: Re: Merging staging?
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 23:45:00 +0100
Message-ID: <6AD6EA9A-7634-4A8E-8A59-F3D35BC0F82A@lepiller.eu>
References: <c8b84a082fc98eb3175172374a1bfcf3@lepiller.eu>
	<87o99gvyce.fsf@netris.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33974)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <julien@lepiller.eu>) id 1ga74D-00034t-Sn
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 17:45:22 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <julien@lepiller.eu>) id 1ga747-0005Tt-UX
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 17:45:21 -0500
Received: from lepiller.eu ([2a00:5884:8208::1]:38394)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <julien@lepiller.eu>) id 1ga747-0005Pi-H3
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 17:45:15 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87o99gvyce.fsf@netris.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

I agree, but I wonder if there is a reason for these to be so low?

Le 20 d=C3=A9cembre 2018 19:36:54 GMT+01:00, Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris=2Eo=
rg> a =C3=A9crit :
>Hi Julien,
>
>Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller=2Eeu> writes:
>
>> I'd like to get staging merged soon, as it wasn't for quite some
>> time=2E Here are some stats about the current state of substitutes for
>> staging:
>>
>> According to guix weather, we have:
>>
>> | architecture | berlin | hydra |
>> +--------------+--------+-------+
>> | x86_64       | 36=2E5%  | 81=2E7% |
>> | i686         | 23=2E8%  | 71=2E0% |
>> | aarch64      | 22=2E2%  | 00=2E0% |
>> | armhf        | 17=2E0%  | 45=2E6% |
>>
>> What should the next step be?
>
>I think we should wait until the coverage on armhf and aarch64 have
>become larger, for the sake of users on those systems=2E
>
>Also, I've seen some commits that make me wonder if hydra is still
>being
>configured as an authorized substitute server on new Guix
>installations=2E
>Do you know?
>
>If 'berlin' is the only substitute server by default, then we certainly
>need to wait for those numbers to get higher, no?
>
>What do you think?
>
>    Regards,
>      Mark