Hi Tobias!

> Thanks!  I'm better than I've been, don't worry.
> 
>> That change has been discussed during review and was only merged after I
>> gave the fact of about fontconfig. :-)

I am glad.

> LGTM, apart from one nitpick.
> 
> Both /share/fonts/{true,open}type are extremely common on other
> distributions, while /share/fonts/webopen would be unique to Guix. The
> de facto ’standard’ for (the much newer) WOFF seems to be, well,
> /share/fonts/woff.  So despite my previous comments about avoiding
> acronyms, I'll keep the latter.  We can always revisit this later.
> 
> Applied as 7d426c5b0e27cc3e72c6e12e07b8c42055cedba0.  Thanks!

Thank you!

I was wondering if you could share your thoughts on #40708?

Regards,
RG.