From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id qPz5KXqel2A29wAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 09 May 2021 10:34:02 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id 4EeAJXqel2D3HwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 09 May 2021 08:34:02 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D96A24440 for ; Sun, 9 May 2021 10:34:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:38584 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lfesz-0004LO-8Y for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 09 May 2021 04:34:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45304) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lfesE-0004L1-MY for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 May 2021 04:33:14 -0400 Received: from albert.telenet-ops.be ([2a02:1800:110:4::f00:1a]:60860) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lfesC-0003gV-Cz for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 May 2021 04:33:14 -0400 Received: from butterfly.local ([5.23.235.147]) by albert.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id 2YZ72500U3BV9L506YZ8sA; Sun, 09 May 2021 10:33:09 +0200 Message-ID: <6844f23ac05f0d6aa739a76eecbd9ca183e53051.camel@telenet.be> Subject: Re: The purpose of the "license" list of a Guix package (Was: Re: Jam: which licence is this?) From: Maxime Devos To: Leo Prikler , Chris Marusich , Leo Famulari Date: Sun, 09 May 2021 10:33:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: <7e605fcdba4ac830ab73719dcda902a2a39ad93a.camel@student.tugraz.at> References: <87tunuq1ei.fsf@elephly.net> <87sg3ejmxv.fsf@netris.org> <87h7juje1a.fsf@netris.org> <874kflrb1t.fsf@netris.org> <871rai2y5f.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <9b059ccb9cc50e27329824f88d9d049072d30f23.camel@telenet.be> <7e605fcdba4ac830ab73719dcda902a2a39ad93a.camel@student.tugraz.at> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-VptcBbEzeTeLBqPU7UdS" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r21; t=1620549189; bh=jw7/jYpG2wH1Lwyh/MlqyQhZ4yhRSXCwbadsyH3YTYU=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=Tsk1UZe0Km8bwdNqyIpbacib7uJAIlIKSwRj0268Bg7RkxW6T78ih+x0xyRYTMoOy 5J+1arr3o2dOgX4Q1aaAHLVXaG8rjzIOtDqlwp/Aras2isrt6ZIAjaLtMpxVZzp3sG Yh/AD3CZIabjZnAShRGNIrvU/MUuKHLIWblvlbt+bOZoDe6oznk9Qi+jPT9uksDjKD 2W77KH0IrgO+sA9uRHKTXLSXk70cGk/an4mZTf/vVPD6nPAXvbCbih0xLOgUY6siv/ BBk/678AzWV9DqlTLUbjwHaG8/AEMLxmbJYqqHWqPtLfNacFQbPqoYncOmbtTqKMMw RBudfZd7L9zrg== Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:1800:110:4::f00:1a; envelope-from=maximedevos@telenet.be; helo=albert.telenet-ops.be X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1620549242; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=jw7/jYpG2wH1Lwyh/MlqyQhZ4yhRSXCwbadsyH3YTYU=; b=tCdjkuS0BzrYxxTU2aK31UJoTP8i1Hsm9YBMBP3KzRHZpQN8ZoiHUbjXwSrS0A5gpsQ1ja H7uQ3NfExYJgOeGJ/AsRcenIKITFNiT/ThvVN9UWooQYKYppNS5KoAW+1aG28xM4T4WD5a 3F1jCDMwhxqhPO9Uk9nN99pFNvBprIe5Gwpydy2za36MQ+d4CHOG80HJaCpPp4RzaV/Z1Y 4IfYHZD9uBgrnfMfV3w8Lt5ySvFfSoUSRcjA/xzVC2Pck4xXfQLIdmWnudJK41XzAJVoFm qdPnMI7n1fND0ocnfPk5ynZyOfW3aWsNTlcABzf/AGivAHec9I/Ce2NYdIBbjQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1620549242; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Uq2eSA4ye0zQuhWhFp/qpv4BO+JycyoAXPcdpYSyGezlvGXzCwrpj038QSkc0FcXbhEm8Q GfMDXHtkdIYlfEZSUKQ+i/jlfJIoRHLPxkYKJWjNxczndlgJ/rKiNuqI2wn5dJlbisr8N8 Nd9EXH+F8IV3tm+FN9uGTK6lmEX3niw7XeUjfiNKMwo+GjMGMhWuGzImLTnc5pjT37w+2A 2VoArXwI33EmG/2uES1YSU94R5pK078kKjd5yrORSr0hS6mLZMxbXmxkDFYBkoBLmzVfiW UBrpS7oRvupaxTdnHMM+mb+WG2qPIFiD+fyKMml31Rw/SHmmaQFZLJVHFFIA4A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=telenet.be header.s=r21 header.b=Tsk1UZe0; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=telenet.be; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.25 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=telenet.be header.s=r21 header.b=Tsk1UZe0; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=telenet.be; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 2D96A24440 X-Spam-Score: -5.25 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: DKkq3qlh0uEH --=-VptcBbEzeTeLBqPU7UdS Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Leo Prikler schreef op zo 09-05-2021 om 01:04 [+0200]: > > and insteads prefers something with basically no licenses. I meant to write =E2=80=98and instead prefers something with basically no restrictions at al= l=E2=80=99. here. > > I would find it interesting to know if some =E2=80=98legal people=E2=80= =99 have > > worked out this situation. > Which ones? The ones who tell you "you must form a bill of materials" > or the ones who tell you "just provide the source"? :) The ones that don't simply tell =E2=80=98do this=E2=80=99 or =E2=80=98do th= at=E2=80=99 but explain their reasoning carefully. E.g., I recently came across which I'm now reading. =E2=80=98Just provide the source=E2=80=99 is a bit simplistic anyways. If A= PP derives from GPL-LIB, then you can't release APP as $PROPIETARY even if you provide the source code of APP and GPL-LIB. Greetings, Maxime --=-VptcBbEzeTeLBqPU7UdS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYJeePhccbWF4aW1lZGV2 b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7pW7AQCwSqLXbMgbrVjED1DOTcgmfUKd GFUA4SIlB8drxI0Z0AD7BFXfNwCb72TmvchflDaUeCoiYVHonB87372RYj9wfwM= =M2kT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-VptcBbEzeTeLBqPU7UdS--