From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Pimentel Subject: Re: Add new package: aspell-dict-pt Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 10:36:55 -0300 Message-ID: <6560a80b1a1547c46a907ffa8609ebac@d4n1.org> References: <74004246f90b81f74fceb06ba108ed8a@d4n1.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48843) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dfndz-0001c5-Ii for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 09:37:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dfndy-0006Dg-GO for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 09:36:59 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:33508) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dfndy-0006D6-BL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 09:36:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org I think better 'pt_PT' but maybe it's redundant. Can I change to pt_PT? Thanks, --- Daniel Pimentel (d4n1) On 2017-08-06 22:21, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > Daniel, > > Daniel Pimentel wrote on 07/08/17 at 02:27: >> Add new package aspell-dict-pt: gnu/packages/aspell.scm > Thanks! I went ahead and fixed up the commit message to match our > conventions (see your previous commit to aspell.scm as pushed by > Ludo'). > > Only one small question: the package uses simply ‘pt’ as the language > code, while uses > ‘pt_PT’. Should we follow that example? Or is it needlessly redundant? > > I know nothing of the linguistics or politics involved... > > Kind regards, > > T G-R