From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: bug#26201: No notification of cache misses when downloading substitutes Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 17:33:37 +0100 Message-ID: <6192548e-04ec-f203-2824-6165e0033ac4@tobias.gr> References: <20170320184449.5ac06051@khaalida> <144e9ba8-af93-fb18-d2b9-f198ae7c11e9@tobias.gr> <20170320195247.05f72fc9@khaalida> <8e7e07d1-563f-666f-2c32-2a772757c86f@tobias.gr> <20170320214809.466dc5fe@khaalida> <20170321083536.639716a9@khaalida> <20170321091313.6b1c15f1@khaalida> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="s4dWQHlMrtrTFbTT83rJJovq0X5fBQ9Fd" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54832) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqMiG-0000Ay-5E for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 12:32:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqMiB-0004DK-7v for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 12:32:48 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:60161) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqMiB-0004Cu-24 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 12:32:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170321091313.6b1c15f1@khaalida> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: dian_cecht@zoho.com Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --s4dWQHlMrtrTFbTT83rJJovq0X5fBQ9Fd Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="n9opQPKifRLGlpULI98rgD2wmV0oEC7Rj"; protected-headers="v1" From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: dian_cecht@zoho.com Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Message-ID: <6192548e-04ec-f203-2824-6165e0033ac4@tobias.gr> Subject: Re: bug#26201: No notification of cache misses when downloading substitutes References: <20170320184449.5ac06051@khaalida> <144e9ba8-af93-fb18-d2b9-f198ae7c11e9@tobias.gr> <20170320195247.05f72fc9@khaalida> <8e7e07d1-563f-666f-2c32-2a772757c86f@tobias.gr> <20170320214809.466dc5fe@khaalida> <20170321083536.639716a9@khaalida> <20170321091313.6b1c15f1@khaalida> In-Reply-To: <20170321091313.6b1c15f1@khaalida> --n9opQPKifRLGlpULI98rgD2wmV0oEC7Rj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 21/03/17 17:13, dian_cecht@zoho.com wrote: > As I stated before in the bug (#26201), I'd prefer someone else respond= > to this. At this point the breakdown in communication is starting to > feel like mockery. I'd already posted an invitation to do so on IRC. I'm sure someone will find their way here. Your hostility is unwarranted. You've made your intentions abundantly clear. :-( T G-R --n9opQPKifRLGlpULI98rgD2wmV0oEC7Rj-- --s4dWQHlMrtrTFbTT83rJJovq0X5fBQ9Fd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEqBAEBCgAUBQJY0VXiDRxtZUB0b2JpYXMuZ3IACgkQkczbm0hUG5lzzwf/aXRr bkUL3OxP88AwFcP79ll6eqKYpiVK+uPOWndIVT/cwFCFw0GLxkNu7gfFjmLR2G5m TquhVpYFJo+UrdbIARF73V+I9oWtQzDTnjFkuO1yDVzjN5n2dtWFJKR8qQ4OApsm 0q+UQVMtXUENxjLLzrS0CvgsiqZ4xDdfvf1QDFQHAoB6hW4/iLt61Wj9LAWYXpwY Wvk2qp0vtXhCoZnDOfOMdYWuIF0ff59bvNzN/+ZvkLjwxSOMVpDXm+0386hsc1xw FGjGU61AWqW1YkoCUsx3ubWgOuCS/hr4e6l2pmFpGNqcIsB/DsXTidZRiKS0xQE2 UyWrUftz2pUjHUwZrA== =eE/L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --s4dWQHlMrtrTFbTT83rJJovq0X5fBQ9Fd--