From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Svante Signell <svante.signell@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Status update+patches:Re: I managed to build guix natively on
 Debian GNU/Hurd , what's next?
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 10:10:46 +0200
Message-ID: <5cea04dc38ef86f209f66487055d57dab6ad6188.camel@gmail.com>
References: <f44f9e12a7e5f274a9130b4d1bd6e56f928790c5.camel@gmail.com>
 <30bdaa745f0a41617e0e81fc6bc63b1228dab729.camel@gmail.com>
 <60498ff6153c81ffa586c9088e35f2e403270827.camel@gmail.com>
 <c688298910d672217295215f0d370cb6226ff28e.camel@gmail.com>
 <45800d03ca1fab9f80bae932a9354f60f6c12a2d.camel@gmail.com>
 <5f5d2b063290517ff9619cf59398b700998b5a2b.camel@gmail.com>
 <875zm9h6yx.fsf@elephly.net>
 <62954aca574f56f1cb980b147fb4f3d8a492632c.camel@gmail.com>
 <22f1e536522d303a01dbdaac3dcd54360f09730a.camel@gmail.com>
 <fd5d64f961cf376240b6d1f7a27f39949f00591e.camel@gmail.com>
 <87y2z5f4vs.fsf@elephly.net>
 <e5c3a54c4e9d8d4a9873510c0039349a166fbacb.camel@gmail.com>
 <87woepf39s.fsf@elephly.net>
 <3770127fed5eb6bf39eba4fb76a05c180c1b093e.camel@gmail.com>
 <a241b6028c0adf1059a84ac5f85ee0e775d9d239.camel@gmail.com>
 <87v9u8fqhq.fsf@elephly.net>
 <8229d4cfde285d01d310352e4a84154b102992bf.camel@gmail.com>
 <87ftlbg2jj.fsf@elephly.net> <8736h64if5.fsf@gnu.org>
 <b9b7448241f24acc64a713ead68de98001f8e1b0.camel@gmail.com>
 <10f931288aa94f116033c175f32694d327dd681c.camel@gmail.com>
 <87tv96mx61.fsf@elephly.net>
Reply-To: svante.signell@gmail.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34859)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <svante.signell@gmail.com>) id 1iBaTa-0008Oy-22
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 04:10:42 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <svante.signell@gmail.com>) id 1iBaTY-0000bs-R6
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 04:10:41 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87tv96mx61.fsf@elephly.net>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

On Sat, 2019-09-21 at 00:18 +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Svante Signell <svante.signell@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > ./pre-inst-env guix build --target=i586-pc-gnu bootstrap-tarballs 2>&1 | tee
> > ../bootstrap-tarballs-i586-pc-gnu.log
> > 
> > Build took around two days, and the log file is 361MB.
> 
> I guess that’s because you’ve rebuilt the x86_64 bootstrap first and
> only then built the Hurd bootstrap tarballs (which are cross-built).
> This is expected because you’ve changed the recipes for generating the
> bootstrap binaries independent of the target architecture.

How would the patch for gnu/packages/make-bootstrap.scm look like then?