Am 02.09.2016 um 16:49 schrieb Leo Famulari:
> +    (name "acme-client")

I strongly suggest using a different name, as this is *one* of many
implementations and it is not the "official" one.

> +    (synopsis "Let's Encrypt client")

The synopsis should already state, this is *one* of the acme-clients.
Something like "Let's Encrypt client  used as standard at OpenBSD" is
more meaningful.
> +    (description "acme-client is a Let's Encrypt client implemented in C.  It
> +uses a modular design, and attempts to secure itself by dropping privileges and

*shiver* Why would one implement this in an language like C, which is
prone to buffer overflows, if there are implementations available in
more secure languages?


-- 
Schönen Gruß
Hartmut Goebel
Dipl.-Informatiker (univ), CISSP, CSSLP, ISO 27001 Lead Implementer
Information Security Management, Security Governance, Secure Software
Development

Goebel Consult, Landshut
http://www.goebel-consult.de

Blog:
http://www.goebel-consult.de/blog/filmgesprach-zu-201ecitizenfour201c-in-herrsching

Kolumne: http://www.cissp-gefluester.de/2010-06-adobe-und-der-maiszunsler