From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Woodcroft Subject: Re: bio package star Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 22:16:10 +1000 Message-ID: <577F998A.3060304@uq.edu.au> References: <20160707055246.GA17506@debian-netbook> <577DEF3C.6020509@uq.edu.au> <87lh1eylhp.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49972) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLUhs-00047R-UZ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2016 08:16:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLUhn-0008UU-Su for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2016 08:16:32 -0400 Received: from mailhub2.soe.uq.edu.au ([130.102.132.209]:33857 helo=newmailhub.uq.edu.au) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLUhn-0008Te-9r for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2016 08:16:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87lh1eylhp.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On 07/07/16 17:07, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Ben Woodcroft writes: > >> On 07/07/16 15:52, Efraim Flashner wrote: >>> http://hydra.gnu.org/build/1295673/log/raw Star currently fails to bu= ild >>> on i686. Looking at the logs, it freaks out at an unsigned long int, >>> __uint128_t, which as far as I know isn't supported on 32-bit systems= , >>> so it looks to me like we should disable support for i686 and armhf. >> Agreed, it seems likely that this bionformatics tool never worked on >> these systems. I will disable builds for these platforms. > Thank you. This seems to be the right approach for now. Maybe we > should also file a bug report upstream? At least we=E2=80=99ll know if= they > would be willing to support systems other than x86_64. Pushed as 'c11f79a'. I decided not to file a bug report since I noted that the README=20 specifies that a 64 bit system is required. Thanks, ben