From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Albin <albin@fripost.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add Red Eclipse.
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 21:24:46 +0200
Message-ID: <5728FAFE.7090206@fripost.org>
References: <20160423022054.16f7aeb7@openmailbox.org>
	<571B21C8.3050100@gmx.net> <20160423074645.545cb512@openmailbox.org>
	<87eg9sd5zq.fsf@gmail.com> <20160502103837.GA4942@solar>
	<87a8k79cwb.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54026)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <albin@fripost.org>) id 1axfwi-0003Av-9p
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 15:25:30 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <albin@fripost.org>) id 1axfwW-0003K7-Lr
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 15:25:18 -0400
Received: from giraff.fripost.org ([178.16.208.44]:45919
	helo=outgoing.fripost.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <albin@fripost.org>) id 1axfwV-000323-Bg
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 15:25:12 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87a8k79cwb.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>, Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Den 2016-05-03 kl. 21:09, skrev Alex Kost:
> Andreas Enge (2016-05-02 13:38 +0300) wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:22:33PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote:
>>>> +      (name "redeclipse")
>>> I would name the package "red-eclipse", but it probably doesn't matter.
>>
>> That would be in line with our package naming guidelines: replace everything
>> that is not [A-Za-z0-9] by a '-'. Do you think we could still rename the
>> package?
> 
> Probably; you are the master of guidelines, so I trust your judge :-)
> OTOH we also have such packages as 'accountsservice', 'recordmydesktop',
> 'randomjungle', 'rubberband' and others.  Should they also be renamed to
> 'accounts-service', 'record-my-desktop', 'random-jungle', 'rubber-band',
> etc.?
> 

I just installed 'red-eclipse' from a git checkout and then the link to
the binary was named 'redeclipse_linux' and not 'red-eclipse' as I had
expected.

Albin