From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Baines Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] gnu: Don't use guix build utils Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 21:13:47 +0000 Message-ID: <56C6340B.5010307@cbaines.net> References: <1455379675-27516-1-git-send-email-mail@cbaines.net> <1455379675-27516-3-git-send-email-mail@cbaines.net> <20160213223918.GB1176@jasmine> <56C4BBC2.7070103@cbaines.net> <20160218001523.GB26345@jasmine> <20160218195505.GB3445@solar> <56C62292.1090701@cbaines.net> <20160218201600.GA3818@solar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kBnTpoanIWqDD12Bg08HHd1NdGd1FUmCf" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32811) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWVtc-0006qQ-FN for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:14:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWVtW-0000bc-0T for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:13:56 -0500 Received: from li622-129.members.linode.com ([212.71.249.129]:47379 helo=mira.cbaines.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWVtV-0000bM-Pb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:13:49 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20160218201600.GA3818@solar> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --kBnTpoanIWqDD12Bg08HHd1NdGd1FUmCf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 18/02/16 20:16, Andreas Enge wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 07:59:14PM +0000, Christopher Baines wrote: >> You can find it here [1], I have also attached it to this email. >=20 > Okay, thanks. I have added a "." to the tag line of the commit message > and dropped the line "needed for vcsh tests"; we can package it in its = own > right. I also modified the description a bit, it should consist of comp= lete > sentences. >=20 > Now before I push, I am just a bit confused that it is supposed to be a= > thin wrapper around "ExtUtils::Command", but that we do not have > perl-extutils-command in our distribution, and even if we had, it is no= t > present as an input or probably even propagated input. Nevertheless, it= > compiles and passes its tests. What did I overlook? I am no perl expert, but I think it just comes with perl. Debian is easy to check [1]. 1: https://sources.debian.net/src/perl/5.22.1-7/cpan/ExtUtils-Command/lib/Ex= tUtils/Command.pm/?hl=3D41#L41 --kBnTpoanIWqDD12Bg08HHd1NdGd1FUmCf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJWxjQLXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzRTg5RUVFNzQ1OEU3MjBEOTc1NEUwQjI1 RTI4QTMzQjBCODRGNTc3AAoJEF4oozsLhPV3LcUP/iyvV5TgbZPSUodUbzYuuLav WuAxFJmGUbniIMPkDPOWXJLyGX9Sjsvk1kvVyWJmT1+hmJyyAy06NYds+LodRoVt LR7Y3H3CGHLwomATRI8nzad24LmIIZxUmc9kTYuGCjBc9V6WNLzpxRP2b5hgyWPQ PU2MTDnkYQRF8/P/8kYassg82T0K8q8Gorv4cqeH2XXG8srbmyU0RZUliFSLYGPt oe/jh3Zh1KtLC3vTxhq8h9zhfzluKcfrqVkscQSqxEFcZetCzKeDc6LG/dzAw2dG beOxrdDHeWt4fzn2yDUm+KfDRm8wDZfKGaSBy0Gq73z4bOh5R3mptIdZOuiMHJfS 3S0lUBrAwM4zvbbgypyOs69y55ZPzssR6ieUf10uouhSlmxy4GaXxRSfRfkWUGng 2RZzT135p2UttxX+A3EsrIz85pWeKN0M+6dy6HeBe5ZVVviFpoc3ZEOTlYrQ/U2z X8aQh4XtVz+yy+kzBtUamtAUKO6JwxlPo8AXduH2GnS0Juo9HX/ILKBtsNWLnuzL uiDXNaCrl9I3hZDu+YEIW9/Du2Za0uoqM7ot3opR5iD8ZVkKQ4U71MO5lEDIvNG+ 7gLecDFgq5Q2FSogKiHujAXhtsYX5aSyDz/tovug3eFMIVJeWZF8sUBDBq28EFgV gPflk3BcyAd9UCTKFVXT =hx7v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kBnTpoanIWqDD12Bg08HHd1NdGd1FUmCf--