From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Baines Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] gnu: Don't use guix build utils Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 18:28:18 +0000 Message-ID: <56C4BBC2.7070103@cbaines.net> References: <1455379675-27516-1-git-send-email-mail@cbaines.net> <1455379675-27516-3-git-send-email-mail@cbaines.net> <20160213223918.GB1176@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="POA4wwdComosqXKdRrBaffhXmMajdm3ML" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55347) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aW6px-0007tT-3w for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:28:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aW6pr-0002WV-Pl for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:28:28 -0500 Received: from li622-129.members.linode.com ([212.71.249.129]:37181 helo=mira.cbaines.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aW6pr-0002WE-Kj for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:28:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20160213223918.GB1176@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --POA4wwdComosqXKdRrBaffhXmMajdm3ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 13/02/16 22:39, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 04:07:54PM +0000, Christopher Baines wrote: >> As this provides a which procedure which conflicts with the which pack= age >> provided by gnu packages base. >> >> * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (version-control): Don't use utils >=20 > I can build all the packages in version-control.scm with this change, > but I don't fully understand its implications so I'll wait for another > reviewer to weigh in. Andreas has now commented on this in response to the third patch. > If it's okay, I will squash this commit into "Add vcsh", since that > commit is broken without this one. This does not make much sense to me, as they are separate changes, and when applied in the right sequence, everything will work (but it really depends what workflow you are using with Git). --POA4wwdComosqXKdRrBaffhXmMajdm3ML Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJWxLvFXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzRTg5RUVFNzQ1OEU3MjBEOTc1NEUwQjI1 RTI4QTMzQjBCODRGNTc3AAoJEF4oozsLhPV3j2IP/RjIX7ZBq9JN23Cme+BBWuFy pTERdM/iATfOgxyRwFJvlLiXGj4o3cQ9zJ/8WOraHE7h28MxBO2hJPGNKVFqKOTB vrmJu53NhTybbsHcsckM8+XaMqgKabcu89lIXrr3NcxtpbtXpw5HlD37F65cQftb rtmqVwhh4+2x1PKVuUsO7AL4mwYvr8cL0E9rRAKx9/aQPhu/a76roOZNH3Fz/k6H K9cqipUc2LbLwuiVoNC04PlRgodX9ig2mAPNgLsNH6bLyw+MtK8WhxaG9f/2RK93 ghmz67M4YHtD6YULKs+uhC9qJuEbA7krTHWSN0WySVXjJt52/GH1UOfpSXwByRbL WeyAKfigSalVNxH7TLekP5aC7wK394tW6kmQ54WFsB5hugO3zHt1IH7z67NGLJfa 6YCsNyidZppfpV3jbcF+Nf136yw2dY+Z78oSSqzPnoaEs6eqOZ9818n6KtgNWpgd Iho8FcrJS2KFnEe16zTXwPnD604g7bx/3jcyvAQ0yL9bdovkrCQJ2TPeMgBGu9/L IQjGQjFNhHWhJgcPXvo94Nzu8dEbEQ83MBd7pjF6OyOXC9Jed/zYuazM5ok+OqxV HBDf232AemNMKCYuRAC89rwD1sqlVLXg66UZGjCjzfOsS4GHwmKf2uTfGANMrFnS DubIedSC5fB3wmjP4fzg =C+Od -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --POA4wwdComosqXKdRrBaffhXmMajdm3ML--