From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Woodcroft Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update biopython to 1.66. Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 21:04:25 +1000 Message-ID: <56695C39.5010401@uq.edu.au> References: <56432640.8050904@uq.edu.au> <87d1ufl3jc.fsf@gnu.org> <87a8pimyyt.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51856) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6z1c-0003xs-5C for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 06:04:40 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6z1Y-0000eP-7k for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 06:04:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87a8pimyyt.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ricardo Wurmus , =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=c3=a8s?= Cc: "guix-devel@gnu.org" On 10/12/15 19:31, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > >>> From bb6e9ba482ea8602afafd9f6a310a8053544bd80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 20= 01 >>> From: Ben Woodcroft >>> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 21:27:02 +1000 >>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: python-biopython, python2-biopython: Update to = 1.66. >>> >>> * gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (python-biopython, python2-biopytho= n): Update to 1.66. >>> [source]: Use PyPi instead of biopython.org. >> That looks good. Ricardo? > Yes, this should be okay. Thank you, Ben! No problem. I assume one of you will push - thanks in advance.