From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Woodcroft Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] ocaml patches Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 08:24:07 +1000 Message-ID: <5664b4e3-b02d-b2be-96fc-3e9cd031460b@uq.edu.au> References: <20170131205815.14576-1-julien@lepiller.eu> <20170207211618.2a600ca0@lepiller.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60324) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cbEBM-0007tw-Pd for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 17:24:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cbEBJ-00058N-Lz for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 17:24:16 -0500 Received: from mailhub1.soe.uq.edu.au ([130.102.132.208]:48785 helo=newmailhub.uq.edu.au) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cbEBJ-00056t-3j for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 17:24:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20170207211618.2a600ca0@lepiller.eu> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Julien Lepiller , guix-devel@gnu.org Hi Julien, On 08/02/17 06:16, Julien Lepiller wrote: > On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 21:58:05 +0100 > Julien Lepiller wrote: > >> Here is the next series of patches. I think I took into account all >> of your previous remarks, so it should be faster. >> >> Julien Lepiller (10): >> gnu: Add ocaml-fieldslib. >> gnu: Add ocaml-ppx-core. >> gnu: Add ocaml-ppx-optcomp. >> gnu: Add ocaml-ppx-driver. >> gnu: Add ocaml-cppo. >> gnu: Add ocaml-ppx-deriving. >> gnu: Add ocaml-ppx-type-conv. >> gnu: Add ocaml-ppx-inline-test. >> gnu: Add ocaml-ppx-bench. >> gnu: Add ocaml-ppx-compare. >> >> gnu/packages/ocaml.scm | 255 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 255 >> insertions(+) >> > Up? > > Can I push them? I've been meaning to review these patches but haven't found the time.. If they pass 'guix lint' then I would think it is OK to push them. Thanks for your efforts on the OCaml front. ben