From: Florian Paul Schmidt <mista.tapas@gmx.net>
To: Andy Wingo <wingo@igalia.com>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: proposal: add "packagers" field (list of strings (names)) to package definition
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 19:43:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <565F3BCB.1040309@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r3j4g789.fsf@igalia.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 12/02/2015 05:12 PM, Andy Wingo wrote:
> If there are other ways we can recognize people's work, we should
> consider them :) Think of it this way though, a packager is a
> person who packages. The value is in the verb, not the noun;
> packaging is an ongoing process. We should reward the process, via
> NEWS, and perhaps in other ways.
>
> Besides, no one wants to be the person that removes a name from a
> list of a package's packagers!
Why remove a name that made it into the list ever? Did the package
packagers package packages somewhere in the past or didn't they (or
contributed to packaging packages - contest: What sentence can include
the most occurences of "package" and still make sense)?
Like I said in the other reply: It's just a proposal to ponder a bit.
Maybe it does make sense, maybe it doesn't. To me it still seems it does
..
Flo
- --
https://fps.io
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWXzvLAAoJEA5f4Coltk8ZHTwIALSvOUmeZysjHbu9TDM8z7LK
KFMJIlf0fe7bmVn/O8ynTiKbPHS3MF9xmNBADPdilQ/dIs7AgZkvaoQxoIogTFjP
ImM1HFiaTV1RagRv+0f+zKD3s16+duDtBKEdu5wcIUVtOl1pmtaO8sNeXLvRnjFB
ZTUxqy/s4/OhsH3XA/IbbXBUc/9uzgunNynQTAyakXvH3VhOdj1jFQxaMU4EfcwI
aF3Q9TVJDAw3kGH6r8eKXLte90d2GZpScNCZ7PSN1KOkYjao3QBoKDyn/jD57wbv
Uf3N245gf55BAj38LCe64O3gXbgT4TNiCWeRMMJ5gPuyF4QYPzXudDEQ8vyc9+c=
=4e0U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-02 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-01 8:12 proposal: add "packagers" field (list of strings (names)) to package definition Florian Paul Schmidt
2015-12-01 12:59 ` Florian Paul Schmidt
2015-12-01 17:35 ` Leo Famulari
2015-12-01 18:46 ` Leo Famulari
2015-12-02 22:16 ` Florian Paul Schmidt
2015-12-02 13:43 ` Andy Wingo
2015-12-02 14:09 ` Thompson, David
2015-12-02 14:59 ` Florian Paul Schmidt
2015-12-02 16:12 ` Andy Wingo
2015-12-02 18:43 ` Florian Paul Schmidt [this message]
2015-12-02 19:54 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2015-12-03 10:36 ` Ludovic Courtès
2015-12-03 21:18 ` Florian Paul Schmidt
2015-12-02 16:50 ` Andreas Enge
2015-12-02 18:43 ` Florian Paul Schmidt
2015-12-03 16:46 ` Pjotr Prins
2015-12-03 21:15 ` Florian Paul Schmidt
2015-12-03 10:40 ` Ludovic Courtès
2015-12-03 10:57 ` Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=565F3BCB.1040309@gmx.net \
--to=mista.tapas@gmx.net \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=wingo@igalia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).