From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id WLyaD+q0ll+RdAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:37:14 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id iGprC+q0ll88UQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:37:14 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE185940917 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:37:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:59702 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kX0oK-0002xQ-NF for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 07:37:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34826) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kX0oC-0002xI-K2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 07:37:04 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x629.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::629]:46040) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kX0oA-0006Qd-W1; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 07:37:04 -0400 Received: by mail-ej1-x629.google.com with SMTP id dt13so12869032ejb.12; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 04:37:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cEVbgYqkOZ0Sd+g/cijsP9sFcSI8CEZ+4Aqo13+YSJY=; b=EcGf4t8dPYc9h0E6rYSyUgdQk50WXKkUXoUUpUOTmLxRFh5mt+EveWWlFDrKoVuOcr Kd/bJKtA+wrrJh6zxZ6L/cCkZx+INPDzqOhtFzb908H0/osFShpacZ48ZgESkfvINOTt OJYaGKmxbUSS+FL1kt0fC/ahVHmNvQ5pvrXBoy8tGBMIvKMhpdSXOOA85of1sUzcXYvT nQnjXNhAI4fIq3vCtJiFhQaKywhIE2kMggYeB4/2dvtR2Bh36YPSXuMEyesEKKhf82mm 6f8IWsY7veVUc76G35jLnAEwKzfTlUD5ENSZCMNFBmuuToKeUSPUNsxMklvn4VeiCO6P 4VxA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cEVbgYqkOZ0Sd+g/cijsP9sFcSI8CEZ+4Aqo13+YSJY=; b=R1S2eXs0LgWZI00vejse0af1hRVK8G2FutBGn/kvwng9w6+HiqPAkRONuZDjBU+Pue U8RhWewGs57+LKuoNrRhnqjgaiBiWz28T6+VE08GDWXUQklbwPBLxtsx6K60aWSwdmSL im9ua469HlXlE9/TB4Y4iqwVlSmx2WTtr1XDtg3nH8sj83AGHWdgcG+pCnodGV06+0+5 eB+waIfL9uqH/VnLWKcy3ZCXHSo42Etk+0U0nw+kaJLLEkZvXExTeulxnzMfmSZMZM7R webQVoGTb/+W6uvQXzoIECRbNoZVunlWYYK2Qqcz5CpwHTYSYuGZeWRLoujGcjWGxN0o JkQQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532qW8fsD7pxM23A4nafuGc3OkWvtbuX7FqsOh8zEklAn0SJgW7c 75w3B8Zt/y0AL6s/B8xMa9AXxYK7somsug== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyvW01lTHrm/+DK83y8eWK9Ikt8SXCpaoObwybBLVzwcBj9TclU5sXmgGMVKL3Qbgk79iOeKw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:9483:: with SMTP id t3mr15963864ejx.390.1603712219922; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 04:36:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:908:c71:ba60:701c:8934:6403:caad? ([2a02:908:c71:ba60:701c:8934:6403:caad]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v14sm5716186ejh.6.2020.10.26.04.36.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 04:36:59 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Advantages over Nix? To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen References: <87blgpl9g5.fsf@gmail.com> <878sbtuyhq.fsf@gnu.org> From: Taylan Kammer Message-ID: <560d21cf-d8a9-6bdb-b61c-92e72333a730@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 12:36:57 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <878sbtuyhq.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::629; envelope-from=taylan.kammer@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-x629.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-2.167, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=EcGf4t8d; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.71 X-TUID: Q6kXqvZiDc9s On 26.10.2020 10:29, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Taylan Kammer writes: > > Hi Taylan, > >> Personally I'm a GNU-lover and a Scheme-lover so it's obvious why I >> would choose Guix over Nix. > > :-) > >> TL;DR: sell Guix (over Nix) to someone who doesn't care about GNU or >> Scheme? > > Have you seen Daniel Schaefer's Peering into the Land of Parentheses? > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDGzCXr6VYU > > Janneke > I had not, but now I have, thanks! This seems to confirm my thought that Guix is actually at a better place with things like guix deploy, guix pack, etc. compared to Nix, where things are more scattered. I suppose it's thanks to the clean-slate development of Guix... or the developers are just geniuses. ;-) - Taylan