From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyril Roelandt Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: pbr: Update to 1.6.0 Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:50:24 +0200 Message-ID: <55EE14B0.3020305@gmail.com> References: <1441573678-24940-1-git-send-email-tipecaml@gmail.com> <20150907090705.GA6548@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51301) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZ5F8-0006Jm-IV for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2015 18:50:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZ5F5-0005Nu-AD for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2015 18:50:30 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]:37776) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZ5F4-0005ND-Vr for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2015 18:50:27 -0400 Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so95932684wic.0 for ; Mon, 07 Sep 2015 15:50:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150907090705.GA6548@debian> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On 09/07/2015 11:07 AM, Andreas Enge wrote: > This looks harmless to push Btw, is it OK to directly push such changes? I feel like they usually pollute the mailing list more than anything else :/ Cyril.