From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ben Woodcroft <b.woodcroft@uq.edu.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: bedtools: Update to 2.24.0.
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 13:32:18 +1000
Message-ID: <55B30342.7070906@uq.edu.au>
References: <55B254A6.3050403@uq.edu.au>
	<idjmvyl1tg4.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37301)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <b.woodcroft@uq.edu.au>) id 1ZIqCK-0000Te-NT
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 23:32:29 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <b.woodcroft@uq.edu.au>) id 1ZIqCH-0007X8-I8
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 23:32:28 -0400
Received: from mailhub2.soe.uq.edu.au ([130.102.132.209]:33430
	helo=newmailhub.uq.edu.au) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <b.woodcroft@uq.edu.au>) id 1ZIqCG-0007Ws-W5
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 23:32:25 -0400
In-Reply-To: <idjmvyl1tg4.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>
Cc: "guix-devel@gnu.org" <guix-devel@gnu.org>

On 25/07/15 01:11, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Ben Woodcroft <b.woodcroft@uq.edu.au> writes:
>
>> There was some discussion of this on the bio-packaging list re changes
>> in usage with Ricardo, but I think it breaks any dependent packages.
>> http://lists.open-bio.org/pipermail/bio-packaging/2015-July/000113.htm=
l
> Did you mean =E2=80=9CI *don=E2=80=99t* think it breaks any dependent p=
ackages=E2=80=9D?
> Because that=E2=80=99s what I think :)
Yeh sorry was half asleep watching Le Tour.
> Only =E2=80=98pybedtools=E2=80=99 uses the =E2=80=98bedtools=E2=80=99 p=
ackage, and only =E2=80=98clipper=E2=80=99 uses
> =E2=80=98pybedtools=E2=80=99.  =E2=80=98pybedtools=E2=80=99 is unlikely=
 to be affected by a change in
> command line behaviour.
I built these two packages locally without incident.

ben