From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Benc Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add most debian patches to nvi. Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:44:09 +0100 Message-ID: <54BFBB39.5030200@gmail.com> References: <54BFBAED.3090502@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36654) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDwVv-0001PU-0I for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:44:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDwVp-00021r-Np for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:44:10 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::229]:63820) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDwVp-00021R-Gs for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:44:05 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id bs8so33933776wib.0 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 06:44:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.105] ([195.12.144.239]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 18sm6435wjr.46.2015.01.21.06.44.03 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Jan 2015 06:44:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54BFBAED.3090502@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org On 01/21/2015 10:35 AM, Andreas Enge wrote: > The number of patches looks quite frightening. From the README of nvi, the > current version dates from 2007. Now if upstream is dead and does not fix > patches, it might be preferable to remove the package altogether. Is there no > viable alternative that is still alive? Or vim in legacy mode? I guess there is vim, which can be configured to behave pretty similar to vi, but I personally think that having variety is good. Of course, I won't object if you remove the package, because objectively, it is obsolete, and I can always put it into my private package path :) > > Andreas > Marek