From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyril Roelandt Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] gnu: Add python2-pygtk. Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 17:50:49 +0100 Message-ID: <547604E9.9090607@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60637) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xtfnu-0007hO-Cd for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 11:51:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xtfno-0004C1-BH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 11:50:58 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]:47311) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xtfno-0004Bk-2H for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 11:50:52 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id y19so4245111wgg.28 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 08:50:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.10] (tal33-3-82-233-82-24.fbx.proxad.net. [82.233.82.24]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bx19sm8834010wib.6.2014.11.26.08.50.50 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 26 Nov 2014 08:50:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org On 11/26/2014 09:30 AM, Federico Beffa wrote: > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Eric Bavier wrote: >> >> >> On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Eric Bavier wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Federico Beffa wrote: >>>> >>>>> Eric Bavier skribis: >>>>> >>>>>> * gnu/packages/gtk.scm (python2-pygtk): New variable. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I notice that most python packages are defined for python 3 and then a >>>> python2 package is generated with the procedure 'package-with-python2'. >>>> Is pygtk problematic with python 3? >>> >>> >>> It has been a while since I did the packaging work for this python2-pygtk, >>> and I seem to recall that there was some sort of difficulty with python3. >> >> >> It looks possible, but from what I can tell, it might require more work on >> the packages that pygtk depends on, some of which aren't compatible with >> python3 or would requires updates to work with python3. >> > > I noticed that pygtk depends on pycairo and the home page of the > latter provides two sources: one for python3 and one for python2. > Maybe that's the package causing some troubles. > > http://cairographics.org/pycairo/ > Are the Python bindings currently built by the "cairo" package? If so, which version is used? Andreas, do you know this? Cyril.