From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyril Roelandt Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add pyparsing. Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 17:40:07 +0100 Message-ID: <54760267.8070203@gmail.com> References: <87a93ftcv2.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57399) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xtfda-0002eD-7d for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 11:40:25 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XtfdT-00009Y-Co for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 11:40:18 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::232]:59445) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XtfdT-00008b-6B for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 11:40:11 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id k14so4226357wgh.9 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 08:40:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.10] (tal33-3-82-233-82-24.fbx.proxad.net. [82.233.82.24]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id kv6sm7038412wjb.9.2014.11.26.08.40.07 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 26 Nov 2014 08:40:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org On 11/25/2014 06:51 PM, Federico Beffa wrote: > Cyril Roelandt writes: > >> >> Maybe you could add the PyPI mirror here. >> > > I'm not sure I understand. Do you mean replace or really add? A second > uri field? Could you give an example? The sourceforge download site is > the one mentioned on the homepage. Yes. The "uri" field can be a list (see libpng for instance). It would be nice to have two reliable mirrors here. > >> >> There is a "unitTests.py" that can be run manually, if I'm not mistaken. >> Maybe you could replace the check phase ? >> > > I do not think so. I do not see any reference to tests in the README > and other source files and I can't find a file called "unitTests.py". Oh, that might just be in the SVN repository, then. > >> >> I trust you on the doc thing :) Is it something that could somehow be >> part of the python build system? >> > > I'm not a python expert :-) From the few packages that I prepared > lately, I have the impression that each python library does something > different with the documentation. Sad but true. > >> >> Do not start the synopsis by "a". You may want to run "guix lint" on >> your package to find such issues. >> > > Ooops, forgot to run that. > > Thanks for the review, Thanks for the package! Cyril.