From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christophe Poncy Subject: Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 23:09:59 +0200 Message-ID: <54616087df14f4a85875f57bd84877c7@poncy.fr> References: <87ftk4hbhu.fsf@gnu.org> <8eaaa9a2-a5ff-b64a-48bf-954150fecc63@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <8eaaa9a2-a5ff-b64a-48bf-954150fecc63@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gnu-system-discuss-bounces+gcgs-gnu-system-discuss=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "gnu-system-discuss" To: Taylan Kammer Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, gnu-system-discuss@gnu.org, ludo@gnu.org, gnu-system-discuss List-Id: guix-devel.gnu.org On 2019-10-11 20:41, Taylan Kammer wrote: > […] What position does he > hold within today's GNU project other than being a wise old person > (wise with respect to his topics of expertise) who is respected a lot? > As a simple user, I see him as the guardian of the temple ("Chief GNUisance"), and that reassures me because he embodies the free software philosophy on its own. > the maintainers and contributors collectively > hold a lot more power than any single person. IMO, the GNU essence is more powerful than the sum of its hackers. > So in a way I guess I don't really see what the statement > is trying to accomplish It visibly sets the scapegoat mechanism in motion, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scapegoating#Scapegoat_mechanism