From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sree Harsha Totakura <sreeharsha@totakura.in>
Subject: Re: Gnunet update
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 15:08:56 +0200
Message-ID: <53EB6368.4050908@totakura.in>
References: <20140812140642.GA7541@debian> <87tx5himzo.fsf@gnu.org>
Reply-To: sreeharsha@totakura.in
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53350)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <sreeharsha@totakura.in>) id 1XHYIh-0003CM-Tl
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:09:18 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <sreeharsha@totakura.in>) id 1XHYIb-0005bU-Pg
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:09:11 -0400
Received: from mail-out1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de ([131.159.0.8]:40499
	helo=smtp1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <sreeharsha@totakura.in>) id 1XHYIb-0005ay-Iw
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:09:05 -0400
Received: (Authenticated sender: totakura)
	by mail.in.tum.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC9F824038E
	for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 15:08:56 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <87tx5himzo.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: guix-devel@gnu.org

On 08/12/2014 08:25 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
>> the attached patch attempts to update gnunet to its current release 0.=
10.1.
>> > It fails one of its tests; Sree, could you maybe look into it? It wo=
uld be
>> > nice to be up-to-date before coming to the GHM in gnunet's birth pla=
ce!
> Indeed.  :-)  Likewise, I hope we can take the GHM as an opportunity to
> hack up a GNUnet service and properly integrate the NSS plug-in for GNS=
.

I am a bit busy hacking for a demo which will present during the GHM.  I =
shall
try to find time to investigate the failing test, but I cannot promise an=
ything
as of now :-)

Sree