From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Woodcroft Subject: Re: R Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 22:07:50 +1000 Message-ID: <52af55bf-03a8-6b99-6fe4-aece2e4b8f0e@uq.edu.au> References: <20160204193924.GA8852@debian> <20160205100040.GA4213@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr> <20160205190236.GA8063@debian> <20160205195449.GA8899@debian> <87lh6yx4rr.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> <20160205222426.GA11582@debian> <63b53a76-8343-38cf-ee2b-81ea517e50d9@uq.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47342) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1biKbK-0000QJ-7v for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 08:08:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1biKbF-0003B2-6d for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 08:08:09 -0400 Received: from mailhub2.soe.uq.edu.au ([130.102.132.209]:52550 helo=newmailhub.uq.edu.au) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1biKbE-0003AG-KS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 08:08:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On 08/09/16 23:02, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Ben Woodcroft writes: > >> Hi, >> >> I thought I'd respond to this old thread now that the openblas eigen >> error seems to be fixed. I'm interested in using openblas so that the >> (as yet not in master) WGCNA package works faster, among other things: >> >> https://labs.genetics.ucla.edu/horvath/CoexpressionNetwork/Rpackages/W= GCNA/faq.html >> >> >> On 06/02/16 08:24, Andreas Enge wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 09:48:24PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >>>> I would suggest to drop =E2=80=9C--with-lapack=E2=80=9D, too. (I ha= ven=E2=80=99t found the time >>>> to try building without this flag just now.) The manual says: >>>> I don=E2=80=99t remember why I added it in the first place, so I thi= nk it=E2=80=99s best >>>> to drop it, considering that the manual tells us only to do it if we >>>> know what we want to achieve by adding it. >>> I did, and it still builds on arm. >> Shall I push the attached patch to core-updates? I tested it on x86_64. >> Or, would you mind testing it on arm please Andreas? > The patch looks fine to me and I=E2=80=99m generally in favour of addin= g > OpenBLAS to R. > > I should note that the R admin manual[1] says that the correct configur= e > flag for OpenBLAS is > > --with-blas=3D"-lopenblas" > > I=E2=80=99m not sure if this makes a difference. Thanks. I changed it to that minus the double quotes, and updated to=20 3.3.1, then pushed to core-updated. We'll see how things go. ta